[lac-discuss-en] ? = Utf-8 q reviewedSeptember = C3 = B3n_At-Large =

[hcarrascob at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q reviewedSeptember = C3 = B3n_At-Large = 
 Desde: hcarrascob at gmail.com

 Hello, 


 Aida given in nail with this new concept (structure). 


 In relation to this new figure stated in the 
 Report the following (my translation) (page 64 of the report). 


 --------------------------------- 
 "A proposal for a" membership model Empowered " 


 Fundamental reason 


 One of the main conclusions of our review is that while the mission and the general function of At-Large are widely supported within the community and the ICANN system, the At-Large organization has struggled to effectively engage users end and / or ensure that more voices of end users are incorporated into the formulation of policies of ICANN. Instead, rightly or wrongly, the perception of a culture of law has come to dominate.The end-user input remains elusive. 
 We recognize that the At-Large community has made significant progress in certain areas and our proposal seeks to build on this positive momentum. Taking into account the views of many people from within At-Large, the broader ICANN system and beyond, we have formulated an alternative model of organization. 
 Entitled "Empowered Membership Model" (EMM), the name is meant to send a clear to the rest of the community that At Large is ready to reform and advance the spirit of the subsequent transition to IANA signal. The EMM has been designed to eliminate what we have identified as the main barriers to participation in the system, and in order to strengthen the commitment of the end user within At-Large. 
 ------------------------------------------- 




 Furthermore figure is eliminated member of ALAC and establish metrics to vote and be candidates (page 66 of the report): 


 These are the proposals summarized in this topic:


 A. A ALS (ALM calls the report because it includes individual users) to vote in an election of the leaders of ALAC / RALO must demonstrate active remote participation in a working group ICANN for at least three months or provide scope and commitment in the respective THIN (also guess at the minimum of three months). 


 B. It is the staff who does the calculation or carries this metric. 


 C.- figure of the ALAC member elected by the RALO is eliminated and who will participate in ALAC would in our case the President and Secretary who are elected by the region. The other ALAC member (5) are elected by the NOMCOM. To be a candidate for leader of the respective ALS RALO (ALM) must be active for at 
 least 12 months to be eligible. 




 I hope I have contributed to this small contribution comments. 


 Hugs 




 Sent from my iPhone 




 The 02/03/2017, at 23:45, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia at gmail.com> wrote: 
 The issue mentioned Alberto is very important, the proposal ITEM team involves a great transformation in the current structure of participation through ALs formally constituted and creating a new concept of individual membership Empowered (EMM), which is understood to be the solution the problem of finding more effective participation in greater quantity and quality. 


 The lack of English translation worries us because difficult stage it should be made known and discussed enough in the community. 


 Greetings to all 
 aída 


 On February 3, 2017, 22:11, Antonio Medina Gomez <amedinagomez at gmail.com> wrote: 
 Alberto thank you very much. 
 When it will be available in Spanish? 


 The 02/03/2017 19:26 &quot;Alberto Soto&quot; <asoto at ibero-americano.org> wrote: 


 Dear, as you know, is ongoing review of At-Large, scheduled to be performed every five years in the ICANN Bylaws.


 The purpose of this public comment is to solicit feedback from the community on the draft report issued by ITEMS International, on the Review of At-Large. It began on January 31 and ends on 34 March 2017 at 23:59 
 Here l link for comment:  https://www.icann.org/public-comments/atlarge-review-draft-report-2017-02-01-en 


 While it is a draft that will be discussed, they are strongly encouraged to read it, despite the extensive, and make comments asking. The blood count is too important to motivate our participation, and after reading it, you will see that the possible consequence are much more important. 


 My first observation is that given the importance it should have been translated at least three languages, since it is only in English. I do not particularly like this lack of diversity, when ICANN is working hard to be applied. 


 I was part of the working group and have already dumped there my criticisms, which are many.


 One is that a change of model, with important consequences for our proposed functionality without having informed despite having been requested. And that functionality will influence the fulfillment of our mission. Another is the presentation of statistics, I see no good judgment. 


 We have agreed that we have problems, but are revisable and can be solved. 


 I am with little access to (or no access) Internet until February 14. 


 I really urge you to make a sacrifice, to read and comment. 
 Best regards 


 Alberto Soto 


 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9d5e421919.html
--]]