[lac-discuss-en] ??? Q = utf-8 BAmeros_son_simplemente_err Los_n = C3 = = = utf-8 b w7NuZW8u =?????

asoto at ibero-americano.org asoto at ibero-americano.org
Mon Sep 14 18:00:55 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:??? Q = utf-8 BAmeros_son_simplemente_err Los_n = C3 = = = utf-8 b w7NuZW8u =????? 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Dear Sergio, are working with the staff and today this mail reply Carlton Samuels. 

 Also according to your request, I ask the Staff translation, but our response will be before it. 

 Best regards 

 Alberto Soto 

 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Sergio Salinas Porto 
 Posted on: Monday, September 14, 2015 2:50 pm 
 To: LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] The numbers are simply wrong. 

 Humberto Dear Alberto, I'm reading what you just put Carlton Samuels and I do not understand what you are putting acabadamente is possible that this email containing strong statement sent to translate to have no doubts that what is written by Carlton it is what is really translating the system? 

 Best regards 

 Sergio Salinas Porto 
 President Internauta Argentina 
 Argentina Association of Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar/> / Fetia <http://www.fetia.org.ar/> / CTA <http://ctamdq.org.ar/>
 Fluid Latin American Federation of Internet Users <http://www.fuilatin.org/>
 facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> &amp; SergiosalinasII <http://www.facebook.com/sergiosalinasII>
 twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas>
 Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto &lt;  https://plus.google.com/104639152443153592254/posts> 
 Hangout: presidencia at internauta.org.ar <mailto:Hangout%3Apresidencia at internauta.org.ar> / 
 Pixelhub: salinasporto <http://pixelhub.me/salinasporto>
 Youtube: salinasporto <http://www.youtube.com/salinasporto>
 Skype: internautaargentina 
 Mobi: +54 9 223 5 215819 
 &quot;Hopefully we can be disobedient, every time we receive orders that humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense&quot; Eduardo Galeano 

 The September 14, 2015, 11:14 <carlton.samuels at gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com> &gt; He wrote: 

 [[Translated text (en -&gt; en) -]] 

 Subject: The numbers are simply wrong. 
 From: carlton.samuels at gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com>

 So another farce of LACRALO elections were held. 

 If you believe in a democratic institution based on rules and 
 constitutional authority, the candidate declared the representative of 
 LACRALO to ALAC for the period 2015-2017 is as illegitimate as the 
 electoral process was marred and fraudulent. 

 Here's more evidence of incompetence and laziness. Those voting numbers are 
 reported they are simply wrong. Look for this be blamed on staff. 

 You really need not be a genius in discrete mathematics to be 
 immediately obvious that with only 14 ALS for affirmative vote 
 'Winner', which could not rise to 46% of the vote. It weighs the 
 percentage that counts, not any other fantasy figure straight out of some 
 febrile brain. 

 There are 20 countries represented in LACRALO. Each country has a cap of 5% 
 of the vote. 

 That 5% is considered the maximum rate. 

 5% of the votes are split equally by the ALS in each country. 

 The contribution of each voter is then proportional to the number of ALS 
 each country. 

 Take the case of Argentina. There are nine (9) accredited ALS. Each ALS can the 
 contribute and vote only 0.56% of that maximum percentage. 

 Take the case of Nicaragua. With only one (1) ALS, exercise IEEE Nicaragua 
 up to 5% on your own to Nicaragua. 

 LACRALO has forty-seven (47) ALS. Only 30 ALS participated in the mock 
 a choice; BigPulse Arcos recorded 14 votes for, 8 votes in favor and 8 Rojas 

 An abstention is counted as a &quot;no&quot; under the rules. 

 Seventeen (17) ELA were accredited and do not vote. These could very 
 and classified 'choice did not recognize shit'. 

 Show  https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5014vdFeWMZF7tDJbzr4zuiD 

 The real numbers are as follows: 

 I did not vote - 37.87% 
 Arcos - 27.67% 
 Refrain / n - 19.04% 
 Rojas - 15.42% 

 There is 100% of its voting stock represented! 

 LACRALO has no rule on the legitimacy or thresholds 
 runoff. But this I know for sure. The &quot;winner&quot; does not and can not 
 represent the interests of Internet users in the ALAC Jamaica. Not in a 
 fraudulent vote. 

 The spreadsheet will be sent to staff.So the connection is made with 
 the precedent of authority, which will also include the spreadsheet used to 
 quantify the vote in 2008 that was originally developed by Nick 

 Ritz-Carlton Samuels 

 Carlton A Samuels 
 Cell: 876-818-1799 
 * Strategy, Planning, Government, evaluation and delivery * 

[[--Original text (es)

More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list