[lac-discuss-en] Some thoughts and questions regarding Venezuela Harold arches Internauta
rok at bango.org.bb
Thu Sep 3 23:23:19 UTC 2015
If this is so, what makes this process legitimate? Certainly not as
legitimate as the first process? It means that LACRALO rejected a legitimate
process to stage an illegitimate one? Have to wonder about the intentions,
objectives and goals of ICANN and its multi-stakeholder process. How could
injustice be so blatantly allowed? How could the ombudsman be used to
perpetrate such injustice? Exactly what is ICANN? They say a society can be
judged by the way they treat their elderly... well ICANN will certainly be
judged by how it treats its minorities. It boggles the mind... What is a
multi-stakeholder process if it smothers minorities?
From: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
devtee at gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, 03 September 2015 17:56
To: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Some thoughts and questions regarding Venezuela
Harold arches Internauta
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Some thoughts and questions regarding Venezuela Harold arches
From: devtee at gmail.com
Since the call with the candidates yesterday, I am still puzzled that a
person, Harold arches Internauta Venezuela than ever learned in LACRALO
At-Large or until the end of July 2015, has not attended a F2F meeting of
ICANN, not meet the requirements of ALAC it is serious It is considered as
a candidate to represent LACRALO ALAC level represent the interests of
Internet users in Latin America and Caribbean.
ALAC requirements as its RP, as Jacqueline published in the list
mentions the following
"D) Demonstrated capacity for thoughtful group decision-making and
good judgment, and a history of working to build consensus with diverse set
of interests working together on policy issues complex.
e) The effective capacity chairing meetings and providing leadership and
support teams or committees.
g) In accordance with the recent recommendations of the review of the ALAC
adopted by the ICANN Board, ALAC should have
proficiency in spoken and written English for the committee work so
ALAC effective and allow Members to engage effectively in the environment
General ICANN. "
As a newcomer to At-Large, Harold can not talk to these
requirements. In yesterday's call, Harold mentioned in the call
You can spend 5 hours a month to ALAC and this is the lack of time
with ALAC requirements document that requires a minimum of 20 hours per
excluding hours F2F ICANN meeting.Moreover, a candidate must
to add an additional average of 10 hours per month for GT as At-Large
It indicated in the requirements document ALAC.
I can not blame Harold for not knowing this because it is a newcomer,
but this lack of knowledge and experience goes against what being
Harold ALAC member and need more time to learn more about and
participate in At-Large.
Some other questions that come out of yesterday's call:
- The representative of Venezuela Internauta is Sergio Bronstein. It is
Arcos ELA representative Internauta Venezuela? If so, when
this change occurred?
[[--Original text (es)
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
More information about the lac-discuss-en