[lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Sun Oct 18 15:23:13 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Dear Alexander, immediately received pedi correction.
Cheers
Alberto Soto
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Alejandro Pisanty
Posted on: Sunday, October 18, 2015 24:14
To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
CC: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty
Hi,
Does not Reflect the subject motion.This is not a vote on a motion I Proposed. In fact energically I disassociate myself from the motion as proven by my vote Against It.
It is remarkable Also That the person (s) Who Moved for no confidence did not vote.
The subject does not reflect the motion. This vote does not refer to a motion that I've driven. In fact I strongly disassociate the motion as evidenced by my vote.
It is also notable that (s) person (s9 prompted (aron) the censure motion did not vote.
Alejandro Pisanty
Alejandro Pisanty
18/10/2015 10:08 GMT-05: 00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org> >:
Dear All,
Please be so kind to note That the First Vote With regard to the Proposed Motion of No Confidence by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was Governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the Proposed resolution, the following question was Asked in the First Vote:
***
QUESTION: Do you believe LACRALO That is competent to vote a motion of no confidence?
1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward.
2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored.
Of the total of 47 ALS In This voting process, ALS Voted 28 (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALS.
Option YES = 7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of the total weight.
Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight.
Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight.
ACCORDING TO RULE 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting Shall Be Regarded as Having Voted not.
Poll As at close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC
Number of voters: 28 · Group size: 47 · Percentage Voted: 58.89 of the total weight
Ranked by votes
Rank
Options
Weighted Votes
%
You votes
%
Voters
1
No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the motion of censure should be ignored
4531.0000
76.87
21
75.00
Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr.Basilio Vargas isolated (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56), Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125)
2
Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / If the censure motion should proceed
1363.0000
23.13
7
25.00
Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500)
***
As per instruction published on the < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>
You May Independently check the vote result under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q
ES == ==
Hello everyone,
Please note that the first vote on the censure motion proposed by Mr. Carlton Samuels has been completed. The voting process will be governed by rules 12, 19, and 20 of the Rules of Procedure of LACRALO. With regard to the proposed resolution, the following is the question First Vote:
***
QUESTION: Do you think that LACRALO is competent to vote on the motion of censure?
1. If the censure motion should proceed.
2. No, the motion of censure should be ignored.
Of the total of 47 ALSes in the process of voting, 28 voted ALSes (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum required quorum is 24 ALSes.
Option SI - 7 equivalents to 13.61% of the total weight Votes.
Option NO - 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight.
Abstentions by voting = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight.
According to Rule 12.2, the structures that abstain from voting are considered as not having voted.
When closing the vote: Friday October 16 2015, 23 UTC.
Total Votes: 28. Group size: 47. Percentage voted: 58.89 total weight
Votes position Options
Position
Options
Weighted votes
%
Votes
%
Voters
1
No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the motion of censure should be ignored
4531.0000
76.87
21
75.00
Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr. Aislan Basilio Vargas (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56) Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500 ), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125)
2
Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / If the censure motion should proceed
1363.0000
23.13
7
25.00
Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500)
***
According to the instructions issued in the following steps on the motion of censure < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>
You can review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <http://www.facebook.com/icann> < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
Twitter: < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2a6d019498.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list