[lac-discuss-en] = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????

[Jacqueline Morris]

I agree with the general principles.
Jacqueline
On 24 Jun 2015 12:58, <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
>  From: apisanty at gmail.com
>
>  Colleagues,
>
>
>  today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
>  on metrics.
>
>
>  Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
>  I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This
>  It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
>  They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
>
>
>  What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
>  thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
>  identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
>  They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer
> counted. And there
>  an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
>  difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there
>  Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
>  spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
>  directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>
>
>  A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
>  difficult to counterfeit. Would make a &quot;triage&quot;, ie would
> rather obvious
>  5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
>  They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
>  intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
>  recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
>  by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles
>  certifications, we must institute.
>
>
>  There is a classification of units that can help us further
>  in this process:
>
>
>  1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
>  contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are
>  LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
>  ALAC and ICANN.
>
>
>  2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
>  Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>
>
>  3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
>  leading to &quot;make presence&quot; for elections and selection processes
>  for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
>  travel.
>
>
>  Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
>  should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
>  make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
>
>
>  If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
>  Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
>  implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and
> achievable.
>
>
>  Is there any disagreement with these general principles?
>
>
>  Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
>  -
>  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>  UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
>  3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>  + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>  SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475
>  Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>  UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,
>  http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>  Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>  ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/22a894d8ba.html
> --]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150625/946e6280/attachment.html>