[lac-discuss-en] = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
Jacqueline Morris
jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Thu Jun 25 11:52:19 UTC 2015
I agree with the general principles.
Jacqueline
On 24 Jun 2015 12:58, <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
> From: apisanty at gmail.com
>
> Colleagues,
>
>
> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
> on metrics.
>
>
> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This
> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
>
>
> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer
> counted. And there
> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there
> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>
>
> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would
> rather obvious
> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles
> certifications, we must institute.
>
>
> There is a classification of units that can help us further
> in this process:
>
>
> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are
> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
> ALAC and ICANN.
>
>
> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>
>
> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection processes
> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
> travel.
>
>
> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
>
>
> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and
> achievable.
>
>
> Is there any disagreement with these general principles?
>
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> -
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/22a894d8ba.html
> --]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150625/946e6280/attachment.html>
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list