<p dir="ltr">I agree with the general principles.<br>
Jacqueline</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 24 Jun 2015 12:58, <<a href="mailto:apisanty@gmail.com">apisanty@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]<br>
<br>
Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????<br>
From: <a href="mailto:apisanty@gmail.com">apisanty@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>
Colleagues,<br>
<br>
<br>
today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion<br>
on metrics.<br>
<br>
<br>
Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,<br>
I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This<br>
It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not<br>
They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.<br>
<br>
<br>
What we need we are accountability and transparency between us<br>
thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be<br>
identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute<br>
They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there<br>
an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are<br>
difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there<br>
Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to<br>
spend time with family or work that sustains; changing<br>
directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.<br>
<br>
<br>
A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and<br>
difficult to counterfeit. Would make a &quot;triage&quot;, ie would rather obvious<br>
5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and<br>
They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip<br>
intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that<br>
recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or<br>
by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles<br>
certifications, we must institute.<br>
<br>
<br>
There is a classification of units that can help us further<br>
in this process:<br>
<br>
<br>
1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and<br>
contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are<br>
LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy<br>
ALAC and ICANN.<br>
<br>
<br>
2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters<br>
Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.<br>
<br>
<br>
3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally<br>
leading to &quot;make presence&quot; for elections and selection processes<br>
for participation in events, especially if they involve support for<br>
travel.<br>
<br>
<br>
Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations<br>
should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who<br>
make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.<br>
<br>
<br>
If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group<br>
Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good<br>
implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable.<br>
<br>
<br>
Is there any disagreement with these general principles?<br>
<br>
<br>
Alejandro Pisanty<br>
<br>
<br>
-<br>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br>
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty<br>
UNAM Faculty of Chemistry<br>
3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico<br>
+ 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD<br>
SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475<br>
Blog: <a href="http://pisanty.blogspot.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://pisanty.blogspot.com</a><br>
LinkedIn: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty</a><br>
UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,<br>
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614</a><br>
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/apisanty" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/apisanty</a><br>
---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, <a href="http://www.isoc.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.isoc.org</a><br>
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
[[--Original text (es)<br>
<a href="http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/22a894d8ba.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/22a894d8ba.html</a><br>
--]]<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
lac-discuss-en mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org">lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en</a><br>
</blockquote></div>