[lac-discuss-en] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / Voto de LACRALO sobre la Mocion propuesta por Alejandro Pisanty

[Humberto Carrasco]

Dear Jacqueline,
Alberto and I discussed your proposal and we believe this is a good 
solution for the problem that we face now.
I believe Alejandro Pisanty does not have any problem with this.
We are going to hold the poll for the 2 weeks.
Regards



El 29/07/2015 a las 08:48 p.m., Jacqueline Morris escribió:
> Dear all
> If it was proposed on July 20th in the meeting, why was it only posted 
> to the list as a motion over a week later? Some of us work and cannot 
> attend the meetings at the proposed time. The list acts as the virtual 
> GA.
> I'd like to request a hold on the poll for the 2 weeks per rule 11.2 
> so that all of us have the requisite 2 weeks to consider the motion, 
> and any points of order thereof.
> Sincerely
> Jacqueline Morris
>
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and 
> Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Humberto Carrasco 
> <hcarrascob at gmail.com <mailto:hcarrascob at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Dear Dev,
>
>     Your quotation is right. However, the same rule says, "As a
>     general rule", which means that there is an exception. It is true
>     that we did not wait 2 weeks. The reason is because Alejandro
>     Pisanty proposed this resolution the 20th of July in our general
>     meeting with translation in English, Spanish and Portuguese.  We
>     understood that the proposal had been known for a significant
>     number of members of LACRALO on day 20th of July. Also, the
>     proposal does not seem to be a complex motion that requires
>     detailed analysis. Therefore, we used the exceptional power to
>     vote on this motion without waiting the two weeks period.
>
>     In any case, we will put the motion for comments as you requested
>     on the wiki.
>
>     Regards
>
>
>     El 29/07/2015 a las 11:56 a.m., Dev Anand Teelucksingh escribió:
>>     I'm continue to be very disappointed at Alberto Soto and Humberto
>>     Carassco in the performance of their duties as chair and secretariat.
>>
>>     As per Rule 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or
>>     amendment shall be discussed or put to the vote unless it has
>>     been circulated sufficiently in advance, but in no case less than
>>     two weeks, to all participants in the working languages of the
>>     Assembly.
>>
>>     THIS WAS NOT DONE.
>>
>>     Can be motion be put on the wiki for comment? I'll comment on the
>>     motion there, since there is an amendment I'll suggest.
>>
>>     Kind Regards,
>>
>>     Dev Anand
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:00 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff
>>     <staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         == EN ==
>>
>>         Dear All,
>>
>>         Do you support Mr. Alejandro Pisanty’s motion? Formal Motion
>>         from Alejandro Pisanty:
>>
>>         a. LACRALO’s Chair and Secretariat shall do an Agenda with
>>         policy issues for discussion.
>>         b. The first 30 minutes of each monthly call shall be focused
>>         on debate of current ICANN public consultations.
>>         * Yes
>>         * No
>>         * Abstain
>>
>>         == ES ==
>>
>>         Hola a todos,
>>
>>         ¿Usted apoya la moción de Alejandro Pisanty?
>>
>>         a. que la Presidencia y la Secretaría hagan una agenda de
>>         temas de políticas para su discusión
>>         b. que los primeros 30' de cada sesión mensual se dediquen a
>>         temas sustantivos de debate de políticas en curso en
>>         consultas públicas de ICANN
>>
>>         *Si
>>         *No
>>         *Abstención
>>
>>         Regards,
>>
>>         Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber,
>>         Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>>         ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>>         E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>>         Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann
>>         <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge
>>         <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>>         Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
>>         <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         lac-discuss-en mailing list
>>         lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>         <mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>         https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     lac-discuss-en mailing list
>>     lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org  <mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     lac-discuss-en mailing list
>     lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>     <mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150729/b645c2b0/attachment-0001.html>