[lac-discuss-en] Regarding election

[rok at bango.org.bb]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Regarding election 
 From: rok at bango.org.bb

 If that is so, why did Lance end up Being the sole nomination. So now you want to get others interested? I vehemently object. Lance did not lose THEREFORE the process and there is no need to abandon it in Favour of others WHO did not want the job in the first place, but now have lost That the conspiracy, you are demanding a new process? Seems to me that you 'must win by hook or crook. 






 ROK 






 From: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Vanda Scartezini 
 Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2015 12:06 
 A: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org; LACRALO list 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Regarding election 
 Importance: High 






 Whatever the accounting That is my view is restarting esta process, calling for nominations, is the best way to guarantee we will follow a full legal process without any question. 


 Maybe other colleagues think Also In This opportunity to be part of ALAC and join the election. 


  Best to all 






 Whatever the outcome, in my opinion the best thing we do is to start this process again to ensure that we do in total following the rules without any question. 


 I think maybe other colleagues also re-analisar the opportunity to be in the FTA and participate in the election. 


 Hugs to all 






 Vanda Scartezini 


 Polo Consultores Associados 


 Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 


 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil 


 Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 


 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 


 Sorry for any typos.
 
  
 
  
 
  
 


[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b093bcf9e2.html
--]]