[lac-discuss-en] = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Dear, these suggestions, plus all previously received and already recorded in the wiky, modifications have been made in the proposed metrics and report on it soon. 


 In addition, we have defined with Humberto that the next monthly meeting devote a considerable time to treat ALS why many do not participate. But that tell themselves. 


 So with the attendance list in hand (I only need the data of those who attended the meeting in Buenos Aires F2F), invite especially to the monthly meeting, to those organizations that are not participating and explicit feedback. 


 In this meeting the necessary courses of action should leave.


 Moreover we establish a policy that President and Secretary to communicate regularly with those organizations with little or no participation, to see how work to be more active. We are doing this, but now reflect on how bi-monthly meetings, so it is registered. 






 Hopefully improve, many people with good intentions. 






 Best regards 






 Alberto Soto 






 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Alejandro Pisanty 
 Posted on: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 24:56 
 To: LACRALO 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Metric 






 Colleagues, 






 today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion on metrics. 






 Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics. This is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not self-interest to distort the discussion. 






 What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves. Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate must decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there's a middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it difficult to participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more circumstances. 






 A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear what organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that are practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This assumes cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute. 






 There is a classification of units that can help us further in this process: 






 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are incorporated in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC. 






 2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc. 








 3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make presence" for elections and selection processes for equity participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel. 






 Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations should encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who make equity type 2 pass to level 1. 






 If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. 






 Is there any disagreement with these general principles? 






 Alejandro Pisanty 






 - 


 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 
 + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 
 SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 






 --- 
 Avast antivirus software scanned this email for viruses. 
 http://www.avast.com 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d28738581d.html
--]]