[lac-discuss-en] FW: ICANN's risk management

asoto at ibero-americano.org asoto at ibero-americano.org
Tue Jan 27 12:47:53 UTC 2015


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: FW: ICANN's risk management 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Dear, for your knowledge. When estterminada the survey, we will share with the Risk Commitee. 


 Best Regards 






 Alberto Soto 






 From: Alberto Soto [mailto: asoto at ibero-americano.org] 
 Posted on: Monday, January 26, 2015 5:15 pm 
 To: 'Abdul Rahim Rinalia' 
 CC: 'ALAC Working List' 
 Subject: RE: [ALAC] ICANN's risk management 






 Dear Rinalia, we will. 


 Kind regards 






 Alberto 






 From: Rinalia Abdul Rahim [mailto: rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com] 
 Posted on: Monday, January 26, 2015 11:06 a.m.
 To: Alberto Soto 
 CC: ALAC Working List 
 Subject: RE: [ALAC] ICANN's risk management 






 Alberto, 


 LACRALO's input would be most welcome and appreciated by the Risk Committee. 


 Best regards, 


 Rinalia 


 On Jan 25, 2015 24:56, &quot;Alberto Soto&quot; <asoto at ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org> &gt; Wrote: 


 Dear Olivier, I agree. 
 Already in LACRALO We have iniciated the process of ordering of These Risks 
 and we will put them in a survey to try to prioritize. 
 It también está likely to add some others. 
 Kind regards 


 Alberto Soto 


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 [Mailto: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On behalf of Olivier MJ 
 Crepin-Leblond 
 Posted on: saturday, January 24, 2015 8:45 pm 
 To: Rinalia Abdul Rahim; Working ALAC List 
 Subject: Re: [ALAC] ICANN's risk management


 Dear Rinalia, 


 thank you for this pointer. I am still nervous acerca ICANN's tendency to mix 
 Risks to the DNS and Risks to ICANN. These are Entirely different things. 


 As such, the first example of Risk Management to a reference Which SENDS 
 Provides an initial, but very incomplete example of DNS Risks: 
 https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-05-28-en 


 The document then a goes on to list an unordered list of Risks. That Said, I 
 That gives any ordered list With mitigation Should be kept confidential 
 THEREFORE That and I hope the work will be Undertaken by competently Risks 
 assessment professionals. My confidence in process esta Could Be restored if 
 Which the document you point to at Least Mentioned what metodología (NIST 
 800-30, ISO31000, CRAMM, other) ICANN would use for STI analysis and 
 mitigation scenario building. 


 The document appears to Imply That Also the list of Risks quoted is 
 complete. I note only four Risks Relating to scaling and renewal of the 
 ICANN community. Given I have them for easy referral numbers: 


 1.Policy development process is too slow or ineffective, participants 
 decrease or stagnate, or failure to bring new stakeholders into the model. 
 2. Perception of failure and help in Place to Achieve a global 
 IG distributed multi-stakeholder ecosystem según the Widely accepted 
 Principles World Net. 
 3. Possibility That current supporting organization and advisory committee 
 (SO / AC) structures can not scale to support comprehensive and include new entrants 
 and participants. 
 4. Lack of Improving trust in the multi-stakeholder model. 


 (4) is roughly a duplicate of (2). (1) and (3) Also resemble each other. 
 None of them mention capacity building. The ALAC is on record, on several 
 occasions, explaining That bring bringing new stakeholders into the model is one 
 thing but bring bringing them up to date and making them operationally active With 
 the extremely complex topics addressed in ICANN is another. I would 
 That esta recommend risk también está addressed.I assert esta That risk, along 
 With The obvious knowledge / time imbalance Between people Whose job is 
 Directly related to domain names, versus volunteer to People Who Solely 
 defend the public interest, is much more significant than the broad search 
 for new stakeholders. 


 Finally, I would Suggest That the links in the document be checked: They 
 failed to direct click on all of my navigators and needed to be cleaned up 
 Prior to pointing to the correct documents. 


 Kindest regards, 


 Olivier 


 On 24/01/2015 13:33, Abdul Rahim Rinalia wrote: 
> Dear ALAC,
>
> FYI:
>
> Board Risk Committee shared a document on ICANN's risk management with
> CCWG on Accountability.
>
> Publicly available at:
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/summary-risk-management-pr
> ocess-23jan15-en.pdf
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rinalia
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committe
> e+(ALAC)
>


 Olivier MJ Crpin-Leblond, PhD 
 http://www.gih.com/ocl.html 


 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/cf974fd1f4.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list