[lac-discuss-en] RV: Board Risk Committee Request for Feedback on Top 5 ICANN Enterprise Risks

Sun Jan 18 23:09:38 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: RV: Board Risk Committee Request for Feedback on Top 5 ICANN Enterprise Risks 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Thanks for the Ftima aclaracin, interpretmal I transcript in 
 reunin, my apologies: 

 Fatima: Also as Carlton says, I repeat to be clarified, 
 we must analyze if having or not this procedure. Now 
 I surgiesto to see if it is really necessary to have it or not or if you have 
 to have a regulated procedure for the case that at some 
 when we need it. 

 Thanks and regards 

 Alberto Soto 

 From: Fatima Cambronero [mailto: fatimacambronero at gmail.com] 
 Posted on: Sunday, January 18, 2015 7:43 pm
 To: Alberto Soto 
 CC: Vanda Scartezini; Alejandro Pisanty; LACRALO Espaol 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: [ALAC] Request for Board Risk Committee 
 Feedback on Top 5 ICANN Enterprise Risks 

 Alberto, 

 A aclaracin: NO said that perhaps now would not have submitted (in this 
 draft proposal on which we are working). 

 I said, considering that in the Webinar where we discussed the topic 
 some members of LACRALO protested saying that it was not necessary 
 have a procedure for LACRALO issues statements, we should 
 analyze at this point if it was the will of all LACRALO or may not have 
 that procedure. It was a question that opened to all. 
 Also manifestque in my opinion, was preferable to have a 
 regulated and accepted procedure for LACRALO issues statements, 
 although perhaps then never we use; is good to have in case at some 
 when we need it.

 Again I clarify what manifesten said Webinar: I llevpor written in 
 this proposal what venamos doing in practice (without having a 
 regulated process) especially during the earlier periods in LACRALO. 
 They asked me to write it, I did, and put at the disposal of all LACRALO 
 ququeran decide to do, whether to accept it. Nothing more. Now that 
 ARE draft hands of all to modify, correct, improve or not 
 I accept. 

 I hope these explanations serve to avoid creating confusion by assigning 
 words or phrases that were said. 

 Best regards, 

 Fatima Cambronero 

 On January 18, 2015, 19:30, Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org 
<mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org> &gt; Wrote: 

 Dear Vanda, is what we have proposed in the webinar da January 5, 
 with the proposal submitted Fatima Cambronero bean. But some 
 deberamos do not think dalcaraciones, but only send 
 Feedback Received.Ftima manifestsus doubts about its proposicin 
 saying that perhaps now would not have presented. 
 I think that s, which tendramos to send to whoever needed the opinin 
 LACRALO LACRALO are opinions requested or generated within 
 LACRALO. And tendramos to have a simple, try to 
 bring clarity and achieve greater participation for that emission of opinion. 
 Best Regards 

 Alberto Soto 

 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: Vanda Scartezini [mailto: vanda at uol.com.br <mailto:vanda at uol.com.br> ] 
 Posted on: Sunday, January 18, 2015 2:45 pm 
 To: Alberto Soto; Alejandro Pisanty 
 CC: LACRALO Espaol 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: [ALAC] Request for Board Risk Committee 

 Feedback on Top 5 ICANN Enterprise Risks 

 Alberto, I take APRA raise the matter of positions. I personally 
 think is a healthy exercise seek positions and send them to ALAC, 
 regardless of having each its position and present perante 
 ICANN. 
 Hugs 
 Vanda Scartezini 
 Polo Consultores Associados 
 Av.Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 
 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil 
 Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 
 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 
 Sorry for any typos. 

 On 1/18/15, 1:38, &quot;Alejandro Pisanty&quot; <apisanty at gmail.com 
<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com> &gt; Wrote: 
 > Alberto, 
 > 
 > Thank you for taking this initiative, productive and concrete. 
 > 
 > I think the issue we can better develop risk is 
 > Change 
 > In the model of governance that sealas about rule changes 
 > Decision making GAC; pass from consensus to votaciny is 
 > &quot;Infect&quot; the Board. 
 > 
 > As isolated and punctual element is important, but it is much more if 
 > Associated with a change in culture to produce a departure from the consensus ms 
 > General. 
 > 
 > As ordered other / as representatives of organizations in the LACRALO 
 > Sealado risks that we have so far?How to compare them with those of 
 > Other orders (financial, computer safety, etc.) has pointed 
 > Alberto? 
 > 
 > Alejandro Pisanty 
 > 
 > 01.17.2015 22:35 GMT-06: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org 
<mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org> &gt;: 
 > 
 >> Alejandro and everyone. It is always beneficial to carry these discussion 
 >> Issues. 
 >> I do not ssi may invoke risk sistmico very particular topics 
 >> Financial, although I admit that maybe We could get to determine 
 >> A 
 >> Risk to produce a cascading effect within the organization. 
 >> 
 >> But we can propose risks. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> So we can understand and quizsrpidamente I propose something, quote 
 >> Partially chrter Risk Committee of Board as outside 
 Defined &gt;&gt; 
 >> 2009: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> A: supervision of risk management of ICANN as an organization, 
 >> Including the following activities: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 1.Review and advise on ICANN policies, plans and programs 
 >> Related to risk management; 
 >> 
 >> 2. Monitoring the effectiveness of programs for management of 
 >> Risks, including operational risk control gestiny; 
 >> 
 >> 3. The supervision of non-financial risk exposure 
 >> Significant for ICANN and the steps taken to monitor and 
 >> Control such exposure; 
 >> 
 >> 4. Keep informed about ICANN conditions and obtencin 
 >> Familiarity with ICANN processes in order to identify 
 >> Possible futures and advise on plans to address risks 
 >> These risks, according applicable; and 
 >> 
 >> 5. revision of other areas of appropriate risk concentration. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> B: supervision of operational activities including the revision of the 
 >> Informaciny monitoring the effectiveness of the management of the 
 >> Operational activities such as: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 1.The effectiveness of the technology used by ICANN; 
 >> 
 >> 2. FITNESS ICANN policies of continuity 
 >> Business; and 
 >> 
 >> 3. Facing the changes in the business environment that can be 
 ICANN &gt;&gt; important operations. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> Chrter addition to this, we have to consider the temtica of 
 >> Risks has been divided into: 
 >> 
 >> - Credits 
 >> 
 >> - Legal 
 >> 
 >> - Marketing / Prices 
 >> 
 >> - REPUTATION 
 >> 
 >> This Could we maybe focus on A.3 and B. on three points. 
 >> 
 >> And will suggest such risks: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> - System Safety ICANN: The hack recently 
 >> Time systems CZDS Whois wiki. Qutecnologa estn 
 >> Using? Hirimucho the reputation of ICANN.
 >> 
 >> - Change in the Board Voting system to assimilate to 
 >> The GAC. Has relationship with B.2. but their results are in 
 >> Against 
 >> System of multiple stakeholders. If the foundation is that the 
 >> GAC 
 >> Is rene fewer times, and until today was more effective system 
 >> Board of 
 >> ICANN, the GAC ms meets once per year and is assimilated to ICANN. 
 >> 
 >> - When ICG creel took into account only certain 
 >> Model components multiple stakeholders. As to 
 >> We are concerned, was not expected to ALAC sent a report 
 >> Participatory. The individual user which represent non est 
 >> Within 
 >> Business Continuity ICANN, IANA before the transition? 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> I hope you participation, and although we can not make a report 
 Formal &gt;&gt; 
 >> LACRALO, perhaps we can send suggestions individually.I say 
 >> No 
 >> We can formally make them not only by time, but because there 
 >> About 
 >> Understand that there is no need for LACRALO make propositions. Are 
 >> Est 
 >> Discussing a procedure thereon. 
 >> 
 >> Best Regards 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> Alberto Soto 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> * From: * Alejandro Pisanty [mailto: apisanty at gmail.com 
<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com> ] 
 >> * Sent: * saturday, January 17, 2015 10:01 pm 
 >> * To: * Alberto Soto 
 >> * CC: * LACRALO Espaol 
 >> * Subject: * Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: [ALAC] Board Risk Committee Request 
 >> For Feedback on Top 5 ICANN Enterprise Risks 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> Alberto, 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> Get two weeks. There will be a topic suitable for discussion in LACRALO? 
 >> Although we do not produce a collective expression the discussion may 
 >> Feed 
 >> Individual points of view.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> I provoke its inception proposed as a risk worth inclusion 
 >> &quot;At Large unlimited expansion without accountability or measures 
 >> Effectiveness &quot;... (there are others, but ste may be one that allows 
 >> Calibrate 
 >> Way to enter discuss). 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> T cul consider to be the most important risk sistmico 
 >> About 
 >> Which pudiramos argue constructively and effectively? 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> Best regards. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> Alejandro Pisanty 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alberto Soto 
 >> <asoto at ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org> &gt; 
 >> Wrote: 
 >> 
 >> Dear, please ask if you have any suggestions on this 
 >> Subject, enven directly to mail indicated. Time is short.
 >> Thanks and best regards 
 >> 
 >> Alberto Soto 
 >> 
 >> ----- Original Message ----- 
 >> From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
<mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 >> [Mailto: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
<mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On behalf of Alan 
 Greenberg &gt;&gt; 
 >> Sent: I saturday, January 17, 2015 1:03 pm 
 >> To: ALAC 
 >> Subject: Re: [ALAC] Board Risk Committee Request for Feedback on Top 5 
 ICANN &gt;&gt; 
 >> Enterprise Risks 
 >> 
 >> If anyone has any thoughts on This, por favor forward and I will collate 
 >> Them 
 >> And send them in. 
 >> 
 >> Alan 
 >> 
 >> At 01/17/2015 10:10 a.m., David Olive wrote: 
 >> 
 >>> Below is a note from the ICANN Board Risk Committee Co-Chairs. 
 >>> 
 >>> --------------------------------------------- 
 >>> 
 >>> Dear SO / AC / SG: 
 >>> 
 >>> The Board Risk Committee (BRC) is tasked to Provide oversight and 
 >>> Guidance into enterprise risk identification and remediation for ICANN.
 >>> ICANN has developed a risk management framework and metodología That Is 
 >>> Used to Identify, mitigate and monitor Risks. 
 >>> 
 >>> The purpose of esta email is to reach out to you, the SO / AC / SG 
 >>> Leadership, to ask your group to identify identity factotum believes it what are the top 
 >>> Five enterprise-wide Risks to ICANN. This feedback process Allows us to 
 >>> Calibrate and evaluate- internally With Those Identified Risks 
 >>> Identified by the community. 
 >>> 
 >>> We envision a response as an enumerated list of the top five enterprise 
 >>> Risks That your SO or AC group factotum believes ought to be ICANNs top 
 >>> Priorities. 
 >>> 
 >>> We ask to Provide a written response via email by 5 February 2015. We 
 >>> In Original anticipate discussion on Risks Identified in the SO / AC 
 >>> Constituency meetings With The Board During ICANN 52 in Singapore. 
 >>> Please send all written responses Directly to 
 >>> <mailto:Enterprise-Risk at ICANN.Org <mailto:Enterprise-Risk at ICANN.Org>
 > Enterprise-Risk at ICANN.Org <mailto:Enterprise-Risk at ICANN.Org> .
 >>> 
 >>> We Understand that you 'the May not have any time to Develop a Formal 
 >>> Response from your SO or AC group. In That case, we would appreciate 
 >>> Reviews us with you providing your own views or staff Those of a small 
 >>> Sub-set of your SO or AC group, but please let us know if you Have Done 
 >>> So. We will iterate the process to improve increase it and comments on possible 
 >>> Improvements are most welcome. 
 >>> 
 >>> Again, thank you in advance and we look forward to your input. 
 >>> 
 >>> Regards, 
 >>> Mike Silber &amp; Ram Mohan 
 >>> ICANN Board Risk Committee Co-Chairs 
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>> David A. Olive 
 >>> Vice President, Policy Development Support General Manager, ICANN 
 >>> Regional Headquarters Istanbul Hakki Yeten Selenium Square Cad. No: 10 / C 
 >>> K: 10 34349 Fulya, Besiktas, Istanbul Internet Corporation for Assigned 
 >>> Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
 >>> 
 >>> Direct Line: +90.212.999.6212 
 >>> Mobile: + 1.202.341.3611 
 >>> Mobile: +90.533.341.6550 
 >>> Email: <mailto:david.olive at icann.org <mailto:david.olive at icann.org>
 > David.olive at icann.org <mailto:david.olive at icann.org>
 >>> Www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
 >>> 
 >> _______________________________________________ 
 >> ALAC mailing list 
 >> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 >>  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac 
 >> 
 >> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>  https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+( 
 >> ALA 
 >> C) 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> --- 
 >> Avast antivirus software scanned this e-mail in 
 >> For viruses. 
 >> Http://www.avast.com 
 >> 
 >> _______________________________________________ 
 >> Lac-discuss-en mailing list 
 >> Lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
<mailto:lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 >>  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 
 >> 
 >> Http://www.lacralo.org 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> - 
 >> 
 >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 >> Faculty of Chemistry UNAM 
 >> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 
 >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 
 >> FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 
 >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 >> Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, 
 >> Http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 >> ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 >>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
 >> 
 >> 
 ------------------------------ &gt;&gt; 
 >> <http://www.avast.com/>
 >> 
 >> Avast antivirus software scanned this e-mail in 
 >> For viruses.
 >> Www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com>
 >> 
 >> 
 > 
 > 
 > - 
 > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
>     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>Facultad de Química UNAM
>Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
>Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
>http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>_______________________________________________
>lac-discuss-es mailing list
>lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
 >  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 
 > 
 > Http://www.lacralo.org 

 --- 
 Avast antivirus software scanned this e-mail in search 
 virus. 
 http://www.avast.com 

 _______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/44312b69c6.html
--]]