[lac-discuss-en] Net Neutrality

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Net Neutrality 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Len, excellent starter to continue reflecting According to the conditions 
 existing in each country. Your concerns are absolutely shared 
 several passes of our Regin. 
 Continue, is a way to start generating policies and avoid 
 Sterile discussions. I would like to hear opinions of technicians 
 informticos for the security of the information in each country, if there 
 or not laws, and if so, whether they are appropriate ... not interested in the numbering 
 internal in each country, but the concepts of information security that 
 estn involved. 
 Best Regards 


 Alberto Soto 


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: Len Felipe Sanchez Amba [mailto: leonfelipe at sanchez.mx] 
 Posted on: Thursday, February 26, 2015 11:25 pm 
 To: Alberto Soto 
 CC: LACRALO Espaol 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Net Neutrality 


 Hello Alberto,


 Certainly at first seems positive. I want to be more cautious and 
 wait out the full text of the resolution to analyze 
 in detail and see possible implications may be different 
 aspects. 


 For example I am concerned that by qualifying as a public good, the State 
 you can claim and exercise leadership on it. If a State 
 democrtico and principles, it may not be serious. If it is a regime 
 authoritarian and does not respect human rights, change the vision. 


 One of the questions I formulated me is with this new classification 
 that sernms communications prone espionage was by 
 agencies like the NSA? I do not know. Just ahla caution not to celebrate before 
 time to not have the details of the case.


 In the case of Mexico, to name a parallel scenario, the State in a 
 given time may take control infrastructure 
 telecommunications (being pblica) and control, under the justification of 
 national security, communications without there being resource 
 protect citizens against abuse. Again I reflect. In 
 State respectful of human rights, the rule may well control 
 infrastructure and communications flow without the citizen 
 have (much) to worry about. But in a state where respect for 
 human rights is lax, to put it in some way, the preocupacin 
 should be mayscula. 


 I think the issue darpara much analysis, reflection and discussion in 
 months to come. 


 Thanks for bringing us the note! 




 Regards, 






 Len 


> El 26/02/2015, a las 19:52, Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
> 
> Es una medida que ojalá prospere y sea ejemplo para los gobiernos de
> Región:
> 
> 
> 
> http://goo.gl/Rjmc7H
> 
> 
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> 
> 
> 
> Alberto Soto
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en
> http://www.avast.com
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> 
> http://www.lacralo.org




 Avast antivirus software scanned this e-mail for viruses. 
 http://www.avast.com 


 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6fed68ba47.html
--]]