[lac-discuss-en] Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability
vanda at scartezini.org
vanda at scartezini.org
Sun Aug 30 19:29:30 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability
From: vanda at scartezini.org
I agree with you in many parts Alberto and Alejandro well. There is a clear distinction between civil society is understood as organized civil society and citizens as independent of any organization.
Still believe that the citizens if they are already and will sofre impacts from the Internet with the transition, some points to keep in mind: if now with the gTLDs if we have strict contracts the RAA, you can imagine how it could be if we have a governance thinner and without the strong involvement of "ALAC and its regional"; other points are also relevant as data, distribution of IPV6 etc.
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
From: "lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> "On Behalf Of Alberto Soto
Date: Saturday, August 29, 2015 at 20:24
To: "lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> "
Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability
Comment admitted to the wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/LACRALO+Page+on+At-Large+Briefing+on+2nd+Draft+CCWG-Accountability+Proposal
Alejandro, I agree with paragraph where At Large difference to the rest of the non-commercial Constituency, although various interests intersect each other. Beyond them.
1. By now, about the "international law" and not worry. No details on its implementation now, and neither affects the moment in the transition. I believe that can be analyzed in due course.
2. While the multi-stakeholder model is maintained, I think that consideration of end users should other care, but I do not think that affects the transition.If there is a topic that makes data protection of end users, which is not considered anywhere, very particularly considering what is called "Internet of things" but did not think it will come in time for a proposal studied .
I fully agree with what you express in point 3.
In this regard, ICANN is not very clear, perhaps for different languages, various concepts. It has even been mentioned in one of the meetings held in the last week.
The Spanish Royal Academy says about society: 1. varying Meeting of individuals, families, peoples or nations. 2. Or natural grouping of people agreed that unit are different from each of the individuals, in order to meet, through mutual cooperation, all or any of the purposes of life.
Civil Society: non-public sector, citizens and society relationships and private activities.
Examples of ICANN when speaking of Civil Society:
1.Invitation to webcast for London 2014:
"We invite you to participate in a pre ICANN 50 meeting for participants from civil society, by the vice ... webinar.
This webinar was intended as an introduction to the ICANN and the Group of Non-Commercial Stakeholder GNSO Constituency to the Non-Commercial Users Constituency and Nonprofit Institutions; It is aimed at people who are new to the ICANN community and are interested in ICANN 50 meeting to be held soon in London. "
2. Fellowship Program 2015 Buenos Aires:
"The fellows represent all sectors of society, among which include civil, government, academia, business, the sector of non-profit organizations and user groups. Representatives of support groups for country codes are also included. "
3.The Internet Governance Forum Arab December 2014:
"With a growing number of participants from the Arab community stakeholders, in November the third annual Arab IGF was held in Beirut, Lebanon, under the theme" Arab Perspective to Build the Future of the Internet ". More than 500 participants from over 30 countries, representing stakeholders from government, private sector, civil society and the technical and academic communities attended. The presence of civil society was highlighted at this meeting, not only in terms of attendance (according to the organizers, 40% of participants came from the civil social) ....
I think the tree should begin in Public Sector and Civil Society (non-public sector), if you stick to the Royal Spanish Academy. And under Civil Society, the rest, of course, quoting all components, as ordered, including the Technical Sector.
I know it's debatable, and I hope to discuss it, and that we are not only two of us.
Best regards
Alberto Soto
________________________________
[Avast logo] < https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
Avast antivirus software scanned this email for viruses.
www.avast.com < https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/53eeb92fed.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list