[lac-discuss-en] Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Another related paragraph, this comment estcolocado in the wiki: 
 https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/LACRALO+Page+on+At-Large+Briefin 
 g + + on + 2nd + CCWG-Draft Proposal Accountability + 














 In that same document, the following paragraph: 






 154. Several commentators governments strongly objected change 
 proposed 11 existing Core Value, which states that the ICANN 
 retaining its roots in the private sector should recognize that 
 Governments and public authorities are responsible for the policies 
 public and must take into account the recommendations of such authorities. 
 After a lengthy conversation, the CCWG proposed Liability address 
 these concerns in two ways:


 First, to eliminate confusion about the meaning of private sector 
 in the ICANN Bylaws, we propose a way to determine explicit that 
 the private sector includes commercial stakeholders, society 
 civil, technical community and the academic sector. Note: A minority suggests 
 meaning that the private sector should be included in the description of 
 trmino, by contrast, commercial suppliers, business users, 
 individual end-users, civil society, the academic sector and 
 technical community. 










 Best regards 






 Alberto Soto 






 --- 
 Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses. 
 https://www.avast.com/antivirus 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/000459278c.html
--]]