[lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

[Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch]

Olivier,

I find the draft lacking in understanding the necessary tensions in the non-commercial space, and in not making an analysis of the effects of increasing structural complexity on the GNSO in general.

Alejandro Pisanty




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico



+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

________________________________
Desde: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [ocl at gih.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 03 de agosto de 2015 08:43
Hasta: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
CC: Vanda Scartezini
Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

Hello all,

let me make this quite clear from the outset: ALAC members are asked to vote on the Statement, not on the GNSO Review Report. The ALAC Statement mentions the points it agrees with in the GNSO Review report. It mentions the points it does not agree with and is pretty strong on criticising the Consultants about the fact it completely missed the opportunity to evaluate the GNSO Structure. The ALAC response is pretty clear about that.
The call for comments was made on 15 July. The only ALAC member from LAC that commented was Vanda and her views were taken into account. The only other LACRALO member that commented was Carlton Samuels and his views were also taken into account.

In formulating the ALAC response, I unfortunately received no other input from LACRALO members, despite requests for feedback.

Kind regards,

Olivier

On 03/08/2015 15:18, cveraq at gmail.com<mailto:cveraq at gmail.com> wrote:

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
 From: cveraq at gmail.com<mailto:cveraq at gmail.com>

 Vanda: if you say &quot;I intend to vote in Please though I personally believe, and HAD Such statement made, That the review itself was really weak and did not touch Relevant several points.&quot;


 It sounds contradictory and the vote should be against?


 Carlos Vera Quintana
 0988141143
 Sguemecveraq




El 2/8/2015, a las 19:39, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com><mailto:apisanty at gmail.com> escribió:

I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had made such statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not touch several relevant points.


[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6e497ab67c.html
--]]






_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150803/eae4417a/attachment.html>