[lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

Dear Alejandro,

thanks for your kind note. Which draft are you speaking about? The
Westlake draft or the ALAC Statement draft?
Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 03/08/2015 20:44, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch wrote:
> Olivier,
>
> I find the draft lacking in understanding the necessary tensions in
> the non-commercial space, and in not making an analysis of the effects
> of increasing structural complexity on the GNSO in general. 
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>  
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
>  
>
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . 
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Desde:* lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> [lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de Olivier
> MJ Crepin-Leblond [ocl at gih.com]
> *Enviado el:* lunes, 03 de agosto de 2015 08:43
> *Hasta:* lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *CC:* Vanda Scartezini
> *Asunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement
> on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
>
> Hello all,
>
> let me make this quite clear from the outset: ALAC members are asked
> to vote on the Statement, not on the GNSO Review Report. The ALAC
> Statement mentions the points it agrees with in the GNSO Review
> report. It mentions the points it does not agree with and is pretty
> strong on criticising the Consultants about the fact it completely
> missed the opportunity to evaluate the GNSO Structure. The ALAC
> response is pretty clear about that.
> The call for comments was made on 15 July. The only ALAC member from
> LAC that commented was Vanda and her views were taken into account.
> The only other LACRALO member that commented was Carlton Samuels and
> his views were also taken into account.
>
> In formulating the ALAC response, I unfortunately received no other
> input from LACRALO members, despite requests for feedback.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 03/08/2015 15:18, cveraq at gmail.com wrote:
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>>  Subject: Re: FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization 
>>  From: cveraq at gmail.com
>>
>>  Vanda: if you say "I intend to vote in Please though I personally believe, and HAD Such statement made, That the review itself was really weak and did not touch Relevant several points." 
>>
>>
>>  It sounds contradictory and the vote should be against? 
>>
>>
>>  Carlos Vera Quintana 
>>  0988141143 
>>  Sguemecveraq 
>>
>>
>>> El 2/8/2015, a las 19:39, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com> escribió:
>>>
>>> I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had made such statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not touch several relevant points. 
>> [[--Original text (es)
>> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6e497ab67c.html
>> --]]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150803/48d67911/attachment-0001.html>