[lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????

Mon Aug 3 13:00:08 UTC 2015

As you insist, of course this will be passed on as relevant.
Unfortunately,  it being a working group of ALL RALOs and not just
LACRALO,  I cannot say that the rest of the group will agree with the
LACRALO viewpoint. This is, after all, a WG to create criteria to be
applied globally.
And of course,  I am thrilled that other members of LACRALO will be
participating and following the work.
Jacqueline
On 2 Aug 2015 23:15, <jumaropi at yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = =
> UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  From: jumaropi at yahoo.com
>
>  Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching.
>  We insist on it.
>  Cordially
>
>
>  Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>
>
>  Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your question is
> relevant to the community:
>  >
>  >
>  > June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 hours
> (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline Morris,
> Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
>  >
>  >
>  > "Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion on
> metrics.
>  >
>  >
>  > Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I
> think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This is well
> understood in the community, and those who say they do not self-interest to
> distort the discussion.
>  >
>  >
>  > What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves.
> Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified.
> Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate must
> decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there's a
> middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it difficult to
> participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many types of
> situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with family
> or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more
> circumstances.
>  >
>  >
>  > A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
> difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear what
> organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that are
> practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with which we
> must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the
> organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This assumes
> cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute.
>  >
>  >
>  > There is a classification of units that can help us further in this
> process:
>  >
>  >
>  > 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and
> contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are incorporated
> in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
>  >
>  >
>  > 2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments
> procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>  >
>  >
>  > 3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make
> presence" for elections and selection processes for equity participation in
> events, especially if they involve support for travel.
>  >
>  >
>  > Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations should
> encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who make
> equity type 2 pass to level 1.
>  >
>  >
>  > If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and their
> work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. "
>  >
>  >
>  > Best regards,
>  >
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty
>  >
>  >
>  > 08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi at yahoo.com> :
>  >
>  > Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It considered
> helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
>  >
>  > Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
>  >
>  >
>  > The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus that we
> out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS reached
> consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
>  >
>  >
>  > I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.
>  >
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty
>  >
>  >
>  > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam at jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  > [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
>  >
>  > Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - =
> = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  > From: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
>  >
>  > Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the
>  > WG.
>  > Jacqueline
>  >
>  >
>  > Jacqueline A. Morris
>  > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible,
>  > Free.(After Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>  >
>  >
>  > The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM <asoto at ibero-americano.org> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> [[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
>  >>
>  >> ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - =
> =
>  >> Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  >> From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>  >>
>  >> Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the
> above
>  >> Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Jacqueline Morris
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> - Juan Manuel Rojas
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will
> be
>  >> Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and schedule
> the
>  >> Meeting.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Best regards
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Alberto Soto
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> ---
>  Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses.
>  >> Http://www.avast.com
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/99d87e9353.html
> --]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150803/ff5d36d9/attachment.html>