[lac-discuss-en] Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce

Mon Aug 3 21:34:17 UTC 2015

Much of the focus of the rules outlined here are on metrics and 
enforcement. That will probably not be a major focus of the Task 
Force. Regardless, RALOs can generally set their own rules and 
expectations over and above those set by the ALAC. The major 
requirements are that they be reasonable given the potential ALS 
audience, that they are documented clearly, and that they are 
enforced fairly and uniformly.

Alan

At 03/08/2015 09:00 AM, Jacqueline Morris wrote:

>As you insist, of course this will be passed on as 
>relevant.  Unfortunately,  it being a working group of ALL RALOs and 
>not just LACRALO,  I cannot say that the rest of the group will 
>agree with the LACRALO viewpoint. This is, after all, a WG to create 
>criteria to be applied globally.
>And of course,  I am thrilled that other members of LACRALO will be 
>participating and following the work.
>Jacqueline
>On 2 Aug 2015 23:15, <<mailto:jumaropi at yahoo.com>jumaropi at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = 
> - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  From: <mailto:jumaropi at yahoo.com>jumaropi at yahoo.com
>
>  Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching.
>  We insist on it.
>  Cordially
>
>
>  Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>
>
>  Alejandro Pisanty <<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your 
> question is relevant to the community:
>  >
>  >
>  > June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 
> hours (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline 
> Morris, Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
>  >
>  >
>  > "Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief 
> discussion on metrics.
>  >
>  >
>  > Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, 
> I think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This 
> is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not 
> self-interest to distort the discussion.
>  >
>  >
>  > What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves. 
> Individuals and organizations working activametne must be 
> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or 
> participate must decide whether they will participate or no longer 
> counted. And there's a middle ground and representatives of 
> organizations who find it difficult to participate but have the 
> will to do so. Among these there are many types of situations: a 
> representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work 
> that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>  >
>  >
>  > A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, 
> and difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite 
> clear what organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, 
> the 20 that are practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 
> 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their 
> participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of 
> the decertification. This assumes cycles of renewal of 
> certificates, which must institute.
>  >
>  >
>  > There is a classification of units that can help us further in 
> this process:
>  >
>  >
>  > 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and 
> contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are 
> incorporated in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
>  >
>  >
>  > 2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues 
> Reglaments procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>  >
>  >
>  > 3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make 
> presence" for elections and selection processes for equity 
> participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel.
>  >
>  >
>  > Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations 
> should encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage 
> those who make equity type 2 pass to level 1.
>  >
>  >
>  > If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working 
> Group Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good 
> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable 
> and achievable. "
>  >
>  >
>  > Best regards,
>  >
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty
>  >
>  >
>  > 08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas 
> <<mailto:jumaropi at yahoo.com>jumaropi at yahoo.com> :
>  >
>  > Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It 
> considered helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
>  >
>  > Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty <<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
>  >
>  >
>  > The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus 
> that we out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria 
> for ALS reached consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
>  >
>  >
>  > I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.
>  >
>  >
>  > Alejandro Pisanty
>  >
>  >
>  > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, 
> <<mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com>jam at jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  > [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
>  >
>  > Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N 
> = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  > From: <mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com>jam at jacquelinemorris.com
>  >
>  > Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the
>  > WG.
>  > Jacqueline
>  >
>  >
>  > Jacqueline A. Morris
>  > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible,
>  > Free.(After Chris Lehmann 
> <<http://twitter.com/chrislehmann>http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>  >
>  >
>  > The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM 
> <<mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org>asoto at ibero-americano.org> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> [[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
>  >>
>  >> ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = =
>  >> Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>  >> From: <mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org>asoto at ibero-americano.org
>  >>
>  >> Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the above
>  >> Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Jacqueline Morris
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> - Juan Manuel Rojas
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will be
>  >> Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and 
> schedule the
>  >> Meeting.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Best regards
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Alberto Soto
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> ---
>  Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses.
>  >> <Http://www.avast.com>Http://www.avast.com
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>[[--Original text (es)
><http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/99d87e9353.html>http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/99d87e9353.html
>--]]
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lac-discuss-en mailing list
><mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>_______________________________________________
>lac-discuss-en mailing list
>lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150803/781f6eb4/attachment.html>