[lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
apisanty at gmail.com
apisanty at gmail.com
Mon Aug 3 01:41:40 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
From: apisanty at gmail.com
Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, for your question is relevant
for the community:
June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. During the
24 hours (25 June) met the consensus of Carlton Samuels,
Jacqueline Morris, Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
"Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
on metrics.
Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. East
It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there
an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
difficult to participate but have the will to do so. Among these there
Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would rather obvious
5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
by way of decertification.This assumes renewal cycles
certifications, we must institute.
There is a classification of units that can help us further
in this process:
1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
contribution to substantive policy issues. His proposals are
LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
ALAC and ICANN.
2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
leading to "make presence" for elections and selection processes
for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
travel.
Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. "
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
08/02/2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi at yahoo.com> :
> Muchas gracias Alejandro. Llevaremos esas inquietudes ante el. TF.
> ConsiderarÃa útil tener claridad sobre los puntos a los que te refieres
> especÃficamente.
>
> Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>
> Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, todos,
>
> el punto de vista regional se ha expresado en el consenso que logramos al
> salir de la reunión de Buenos Aires, con criterios generales para las ALS
> que lograron consenso y son de gran solidez y validez general.
>
> Espero que esos lineamientos definan lo que van a hacer nuestros
> representantes.
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam at jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>>
>> Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = =
>> UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>> De: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
>>
>> Muchas gracias. Haré mi mejor esfuerzo para representar a toda la región
>> en el
>> WG.
>> Jacqueline
>>
>>
>> Jacqueline A. Morris
>> La tecnologÃa debe ser como el oxÃgeno: Ubicuo, necesario, invisible y
>> Gratis. (Después de que Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann>
>> )
>>
>>
>> El Sol, 02 de agosto 2015 a las 12:29 PM <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
>> escribió:
>> >
>> > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>> >
>> > ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - =
>> =
>> > utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce =?????
>> > From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>> >
>> > Dear, on this issue we have had four nominations. According to the
>> above
>> > criteria opportunely, they have been selected:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Jacqueline Morris
>> >
>> >
>> > - Juan Manuel Rojas
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > We know that this WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will
>> be
>> > tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and schedule
>> the
>> > meeting.
>> >
>> >
>> > Best regards
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Alberto Soto
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Avast antivirus software scanned this email for viruses.
>> > http://www.avast.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f9714188f9.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list