[lac-discuss-en] ? = Iso-8859-1 == q F3n_Consulta_sobre_Memoran VOTES = iso-8859-1 q = do_de_Entendimiento_con_LACNIC???
aidanoblia at gmail.com
aidanoblia at gmail.com
Wed Nov 27 17:24:01 UTC 2013
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re:? = Iso-8859-1 == q F3n_Consulta_sobre_Memoran VOTES = iso-8859-1 q = do_de_Entendimiento_con_LACNIC???
From: aidanoblia at gmail.com
Estimates:
Given the situation raised me like a good idea if the agreement rate
should sign or not.
It will be a first point to be clarified to start working then
intiles other efforts to avoid, though so vAlejandro
Order a problem but not an outright rejection of the signature. Its
question seems to be more opportunity well: quse done first,
quse must first define who and who and qudespus and.
The affirmation made by Andres at the time Natalia presentun
draft framework agreement for consideration by the region. So that
Andres t understand, not deca Lacnic flatly that had not resolved
sign an agreement or did not agree to sign an agreement with the
region.
According Echavarra the view of the testimony of Alberto and Jos, is that
there is an outright refusal to sign.
Raised this as is presented by Natalia a draft agreement
for consideration by the region in the last reunin of Lacralo, I have the
impression that the vote will be a way to take a step forward in the
resolution of the issue and from ahcontinuar.
From ah, you can go deeper into the study of the draft, the
less Irlo watching, while talking more deeply with LACNIC
clarify their posiciny also manage the content of the agreement between
both parties.
Greetings and I hope this reflection may be useful to the community.
-
Aida Noblia
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f8d3fa9002.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list