[lac-discuss-en] Internet Architecture Board Vs. gTLDs without point
apisanty at gmail.com
apisanty at gmail.com
Thu Jul 11 11:18:49 UTC 2013
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Internet Architecture Board Vs. gTLDs without point
From: apisanty at gmail.com
Colleagues,
aquuna a few months ago we held discussion on the possibility
proposed by some proponents of new gTLDs that can hese
operate without point. This will want to say that something like http://cocacola
llevaraa the registration webpage awarded. In many
browsers not even typed http:// (quin already do today?)
but only Coke.
At the time our position, transmitted ALAC, was contrary to this option.
Today, the Internet Architecture Board, in
, Has published a detailed analysis also against.
There can be no better entity authorized this IAB to say in the matter.
It is possible that in the coming weeks we see an intense debate
this issue, since "no point domains" are proposed by companies
as Google. The matter could be reconsidered. It is important to pay
attention, especially by those who attend to or follow
distance the meeting of ICANN in Durban.
It will be important to know the view of those among us have
ESTN supported or supporting proposals for new gTLDs, if any.
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
-
---------------------------
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Faculty of Chemistry UNAM
Av University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the LinkedIn group UNAM,
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Unete to ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d83068bc13.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list