[lac-discuss-en] Report and recommendations on domains without point

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Report and recommendations on domains without point 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Absolutely. For m, of the problems, the higher 
 the safety, by the ambigedades in the Resolution, and in addition to the 
 use that may be made of this who always are willing 
 to take advantage of "holes" that are left open. 


 Regards 


 Alberto Soto 


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Dr. 
 Alejandro Pisanty Baruch 
 Posted on: Friday, August 24, 2012 10:30 pm 
 To lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Report and recommendations on domains without point 


 Colleagues, 


 in 
 http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/sac053-dotless-domains-24aug12-e 
 n.htm just appeared SSAC report on domain names without 
 point.


 These names are not used at present but may arise in the new 
 gTLDs, especially those who are assigned to trademarks. In this 
 If the registrant may want to open a web page to tecelar 
 only brand in the browser, or electronic mail be directed to 
 email @ BRAND. 


 The SSAC report clearly explains the problems this can 
 producing, based on the IETF estndares, the recommended practices 
 or existing resolvers operation of names, 
 operation of Web browsers, and software operation 
 which is used for electronic mail. 


 The SSAC is sufficiently serious problems (like some in this 
 Community may also have foreseen) to recommend that the 
 "No point names" are not used and proposed that ICANN prohba 
 explcitamente in contracts with entities who obtain asignacin 
 of new gTLDs.


 Recall that in the regimen of private law that governs those ICANN 
 Contracts are the most strong instrument with which ICANN has, and that his 
 compliance can be monitored and penalized by mechanisms 
 the contracts themselves and the system of "compliance". As you all know, 
 this system has just produced the withdrawal of two recorders acreditacina 
 this week. 


 May I respectfully ask our representatives and 
 elected officials to initiate a consultation to members LACRALO 
 this respect. It is understood that this sercon adherence to regulations and 
 I expect you to go the route of the only ALAC if appropriate, and 
 if it also directly applicable. 


 By ISOC Mexico do not have the slightest hesitation in proposing that the 
 RESOLUTION LACRALO is inequvocamente for recommendations 
 SSAC against the use of "names no point." 


 Of course it can happen that some of our members that LACRALO 
 estn related to proposals for new gTLDs, and others, not estn of 
 agreement. Ojaleso be revealed soon and with transparency.


 Sincerely, and with best regards, 


 Alejandro Pisanty 




 ! ! ! !! 
 NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUMBER OF NEW phone 






 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 


 FROM +525541444475 Mexico 


 SMS +525541444475 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM, 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 


 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, 
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a6637e3e00.html
--]]