[lac-discuss-en] Waiver LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC

fatimacambronero at gmail.com fatimacambronero at gmail.com
Thu Aug 23 03:17:19 UTC 2012


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Waiver LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC 
 From: fatimacambronero at gmail.com

 Dear members of LACRALO, 






 I am communicating with you in view of the last events 
 occurred in our RALO to inform the decision that I have taken. 




 SABRN As delegates of ALS have received their credentials for 
 vote and make a decision as a region. We must rule on whether the 
 cuestin candidate meets the requirement of Rule 8 of our 
 Operating Principles, specifically requiring the principal residence 
 in one of the countries of the region. 




 According to the view favored our list sent by discusin 
 LACRALO President and According the many arguments jurdicos 
 presented in this post, basndonos in our Operating Principles 
 LACRALO in the ICANN Bylaws, the laws of the State of 
 California (and reinforced with additional sharee'ah), is my 
 understanding that the rules are clear, both in terms of requiring 
 residence in one of our countries of the region, and in addition on qutbNL> is meant by the concept residence, a separate and distinct concept 
 the concept of domicile. 




 I am convinced that the rules estn to accomplish. And msan when, with 
 jurdicos the number of arguments presented, the rules are clear. 




 Vote in this case implies that if we all agree (or the majority), 
 we will decide what specifically requests violate one of our rules 
 LACRALO. 




 Taking the work of analyzing and respect our rules and present 
 presentnuestro arguments LACRALO President, is a task very 
 few were taken and that many of the answers to that email were 
 full of disrespect and unsubstantiated opinions, with no 
 jurdicos arguments, which is what should be analyzed in this case. 




 I would like to fully understand this: I will always defend the right to 
 region to rule and decide how issues that affect us as such. 
 I worked and I will continue to reach consensus on our 
 region, as it is not possible to decide for most of us. That 
 s, subject to compliance with our operating principles, our MoU 
 with ICANN and the ICANN Bylaws. 




 In the situation we are living in LACRALO, this is not the case. 




 We are voting to decide to break the rules. 




 As you all know my formation is a lawyer, and I made a vow: 
 respect and enforce the laws (rules, rules, regulations).


 Therefore, to remain part of this election process, when going 
 against my profession, my oath and my principles, is to go 
 against my essence. 




 As I have indicated those who were part of the redaccin 
 our Operating Principles, the residence requirement (such as 
 nationality of representatives) is by demanding our Principles 
 Operating RALO to prevent capture by one organizacino by 
 a group of organizations. Unfortunately it was achieved. 




 A RALO estcapturado not, working in a healthy harmony, is a RALO 
 where delegates from organizations that are offered for groups 
 Work, then participate in its conference and decisions 
 taken by the Working Group, which is the official RALO Assembly 
 General undertook to deliver his report to the AG, then delivers 
 without being asked by anyone, is a RALO where officers 
 respect the tasks and functions assigned, consultndolo 
 Officials with the others previously, is a RALO where our 
 representatives discussed Policies, we as members are going 
 delivering, after they are discussed as a region. 




 It is regrettable that in our RALO, when you can not destroy 
 positions with arguments, are destroyed by the force of the faults of 
 respect, private pressures of unsubstantiated opinions. 




 Lords, donkey can work or get results. We are like a 
 bucket full of crabs where to want and stick his head up ms 
 high head stepped on each other and in the end nobody leaves that 
 bucket. 




 This is not the LACRALO that I imagin. 




 For the reasons expressed, primarily on the grounds that 
 estn this case violated express and clear rules requiring 
 LACRALO our Operating Principles, * I decided to quit my 
 LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC. * 




 Also take the opportunity to inform and notify my 
 silence and lack of activity in the next few das, because I will be 
 subjected to quirrgica intervencin I will keep off. 




 Best regards, 


 Fatima Cambronero 




 - 
 * Fatima Cambronero * 
 Attorney-Argentina 


 Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 
 Twitter: @ facambronero 
 Skype: fatima.cambronero 


 * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: * 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 


 * Join the discussions Diplo Internet Governance Community: * 
 http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ 


 * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/ 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b39f3c6286.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list