[lac-discuss-en] Waiver LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC

Fri Aug 24 21:46:27 UTC 2012

Dear Fatima:
I am truly saddened by the decision you have taken but totally understand
and empathize with the path you took to the decision.  Know that you
continue to rise in my estimation as a colleague and as a participant of
the kind of LACRALO I visioned when I came to this in 2006.

Every best wish.
- Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:17 PM, <fatimacambronero at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Waiver LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC
>  From: fatimacambronero at gmail.com
>
>  Dear members of LACRALO,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  I am communicating with you in view of the last events
>  occurred in our RALO to inform the decision that I have taken.
>
>
>
>
>  SABRN As delegates of ALS have received their credentials for
>  vote and make a decision as a region. We must rule on whether the
>  cuestin candidate meets the requirement of Rule 8 of our
>  Operating Principles, specifically requiring the principal residence
>  in one of the countries of the region.
>
>
>
>
>  According to the view favored our list sent by discusin
>  LACRALO President and According the many arguments jurdicos
>  presented in this post, basndonos in our Operating Principles
>  LACRALO in the ICANN Bylaws, the laws of the State of
>  California (and reinforced with additional sharee'ah), is my
>  understanding that the rules are clear, both in terms of requiring
>  residence in one of our countries of the region, and in addition on
> qutbNL&gt; is meant by the concept residence, a separate and distinct
> concept
>  the concept of domicile.
>
>
>
>
>  I am convinced that the rules estn to accomplish. And msan when, with
>  jurdicos the number of arguments presented, the rules are clear.
>
>
>
>
>  Vote in this case implies that if we all agree (or the majority),
>  we will decide what specifically requests violate one of our rules
>  LACRALO.
>
>
>
>
>  Taking the work of analyzing and respect our rules and present
>  presentnuestro arguments LACRALO President, is a task very
>  few were taken and that many of the answers to that email were
>  full of disrespect and unsubstantiated opinions, with no
>  jurdicos arguments, which is what should be analyzed in this case.
>
>
>
>
>  I would like to fully understand this: I will always defend the right to
>  region to rule and decide how issues that affect us as such.
>  I worked and I will continue to reach consensus on our
>  region, as it is not possible to decide for most of us. That
>  s, subject to compliance with our operating principles, our MoU
>  with ICANN and the ICANN Bylaws.
>
>
>
>
>  In the situation we are living in LACRALO, this is not the case.
>
>
>
>
>  We are voting to decide to break the rules.
>
>
>
>
>  As you all know my formation is a lawyer, and I made a vow:
>  respect and enforce the laws (rules, rules, regulations).
>
>
>  Therefore, to remain part of this election process, when going
>  against my profession, my oath and my principles, is to go
>  against my essence.
>
>
>
>
>  As I have indicated those who were part of the redaccin
>  our Operating Principles, the residence requirement (such as
>  nationality of representatives) is by demanding our Principles
>  Operating RALO to prevent capture by one organizacino by
>  a group of organizations. Unfortunately it was achieved.
>
>
>
>
>  A RALO estcapturado not, working in a healthy harmony, is a RALO
>  where delegates from organizations that are offered for groups
>  Work, then participate in its conference and decisions
>  taken by the Working Group, which is the official RALO Assembly
>  General undertook to deliver his report to the AG, then delivers
>  without being asked by anyone, is a RALO where officers
>  respect the tasks and functions assigned, consultndolo
>  Officials with the others previously, is a RALO where our
>  representatives discussed Policies, we as members are going
>  delivering, after they are discussed as a region.
>
>
>
>
>  It is regrettable that in our RALO, when you can not destroy
>  positions with arguments, are destroyed by the force of the faults of
>  respect, private pressures of unsubstantiated opinions.
>
>
>
>
>  Lords, donkey can work or get results. We are like a
>  bucket full of crabs where to want and stick his head up ms
>  high head stepped on each other and in the end nobody leaves that
>  bucket.
>
>
>
>
>  This is not the LACRALO that I imagin.
>
>
>
>
>  For the reasons expressed, primarily on the grounds that
>  estn this case violated express and clear rules requiring
>  LACRALO our Operating Principles, * I decided to quit my
>  LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC. *
>
>
>
>
>  Also take the opportunity to inform and notify my
>  silence and lack of activity in the next few das, because I will be
>  subjected to quirrgica intervencin I will keep off.
>
>
>
>
>  Best regards,
>
>
>  Fatima Cambronero
>
>
>
>
>  -
>  * Fatima Cambronero *
>  Attorney-Argentina
>
>
>  Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
>  Twitter: @ facambronero
>  Skype: fatima.cambronero
>
>
>  * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: *
>  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
>
>  * Join the discussions Diplo Internet Governance Community: *
>  http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/
>
>
>  * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b39f3c6286.html
> --]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>