[lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to

Fri Aug 17 17:25:01 UTC 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to 
 From: apisan at unam.mx

 Natalia, 

 thanks for spending the BALN. Go back, adding value: 

 1. Cul was your position in inmovilizacin ALAC on domain names subject to UDRP? 

 2. The position of inmovilizacin LACRALO on domain names subject to UDRP may articulate studying two poles: 

 a. the viewpoint of the user who registers a domain name without any abuse and is accused of abuse in a UDRP. This user has interest in the domain name and continue to solve, allowing services to the last day that the UDRP has concluded that it must yield. 

 b. the user's viewpoint challenging a domain name registration that affects you negatively. This user will probably prefer to leave the domain name to resolve from the first moment that your complaint is received by the UDRP provider for processing.

 An axis perpendicular to these two is the users who are not registrants, but depend on the Resolution of the contested domain name. How they swing their interests, assuming that the registration is abusive or abusive to controvertirlo procedure? 

 This will only be resolved by defining the interests, and we take issues like due process and presumption of innocence. 

 ESTs according to this approach? It's different approach is estaplicando in ALAC? It is very likely to be much more advanced. 

 Alejandro Pisanty 

 ! ! ! !! 
 NEW PHONE NUMBER - NEW PHONE NUMBER 

 FROM ABROAD +52-1-5541444475 

 FROM +525541444475 MXICO 

 SMS +525541444475 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 

 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 

 ________________________________ 
 From: Natalia Enciso [natalia.enciso @ gmail.com] 
 Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:35 
 To: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch 
 CC: Juan Manuel Rojas, LACRALO Espaol 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to 

 Thanks Juan Manuel for the tip. 

 Alexander, you leave the link of Policy Development at-large  https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Policy+Development+Page 

 To start the discussion will be interesting to read your comments and knowledge on the subject. 

 Yours sincerely, 
 Natalia 

 On August 17, 2012 12:21, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan at unam.mx<mailto:apisan at unam.mx> &gt; EscribitbNL&gt; Juan Manuel, 

 thanks for this notice. The work you refer to in it, put a &quot;lock&quot; freeze, a domain name subject to a dispute under the UDRP, will seem of greater interest to Internet users to whom we represent, is not right?

 To start the work of the WG to appointments, takes out a few months ago a survey of &quot;registrars&quot; and among the providers of UDRP RESOLUTION, which can be seen in summary updated  https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31174551/Survey+Findings+-+Updated+19+July+2012.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1343133894000 

 To start a intervencin by LACRALO think it's important to see at least the following steps: 

 1. Our representatives to inform us qupasos ALAC ALAC esttomando about it. 

 2. That the President of LACRALO propose a work plan with dates, deliverables and responsible precise, assuming leadership. 

 3. May each of us explore within our organizations have qupuntos users view and quconocimiento and experience have people who perform procedures UDRP. 

 4. That lawyers LACRALO members, of which we speak both Carlos Aguirre These days, we share their experiences and tell us about how they have seen that users are affected, both positively and negatively, on different inmovilizacin cases of names under UDRP. 

 5.That both lawyers and representatives of users consider the regional effects especficos as the UDRP estreflejada in LDRPS when stas exist in the ccTLDs, and should be expected that changes in the UDRP eventually be reflected in LDRPS. 

 Obviously this is a tentative proposal and I am sure other members of LACRALO more tucked in the market for domain names in dispute podrn do better. 

 Alejandro Pisanty 

 ! ! ! !! 
 NEW PHONE NUMBER - NEW PHONE NUMBER 

 +52-1-5541444475 <tel:%2B52-1-5541444475> FROM ABROAD 

 +525541444475 <tel:%2B525541444475> FROM MXICO 

 SMS +525541444475 <tel:%2B525541444475>
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 

 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 ________________________________________ 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On behalf of Juan Manuel Rojas [jumaropi at yahoo.com <mailto:jumaropi at yahoo.com> ] 
 Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:37 
 To: LACRALO Espaol 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to 

 The WG Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings EXTENDED Subject to comment period until September 4. 

 http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/udrp-locking-25jul12-en.htm 

 JUAN MANUEL ROJAS 
 Social Communicator 
 President - AGEIA DENSI Colombia 

 Twitter: @ JmanuRojas 

 Join LACRALO: 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 
 _______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5ae245c10b.html
--]]