[lac-discuss-en] Could CISPA Be the Next SOPA?

[Carlton Samuels]

Hi Raquel:
You placed a few interesting perspectives in the debate, thanks for that.

That aside, it appears you may have interpreted my response as an
endorsement of CISPA/SOPA and/or like regimes.  For me to opine that what
the CISPA law intends is already being done is no way and cannot be taken
as an endorsement.

FWIW, my position in these matters is reflexively libertarian.  But,
willing to accept modest refinements in reason and for broad public policy
effect.

Best,
- Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Raquel Gatto <raquel.gatto at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Carlton,
>
> I agree that we should have a coherent argument, in public or private
> regimes, for what we want to keep in privacy ranges/records.
>
> But having it codified the wrong way (which in my opinion is exactly the
> problem of SOPA/CISPA and others) is what will weak the users voice to
> protect their personal data and privacy.
>
> We are talking about two different regimes: (i) one is public regime which
> is due to government. they have limits to act, especially to keep the
> accountability to the legitimate sovereigns - the citizens. Of course we
> are not in the perfect world and sometimes it is not the way things work.
> But it doesn`t mean it shouldn`t and we shouldn`t keep an eye on it, even
> if it is to be against taking my/our privacy in name of cyber intelligence
> management ;) and (ii) we have the other regime which is a private one. It
> is limited by some consumer and privacy regulation that change from place
> to place, but in the end we are talking about a choice from a client. So
> they have the market bounding and electing their choices to keep them on
> the right track.
>
> My 2 cents...
>
> []s Raquel
>
>
> 2012/4/10 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
>
>> Thanks, Juan Manuel for sharing.  In my view, this essentially only
>> codifies and bring out to the open what has been standard practice
>> forever.
>>
>>
>> The fact is most technologies begin with an intensely security/military
>> focus and then seeps into the commercial world. It has always seem odd to
>> me that most of us tend to accept that Microsoft and Google can do it but,
>> somehow, not the government. At least not without our prior knowledge.
>>  Especially when government [collectively] is possibly the single largest
>> buyer of ICTs.
>>
>> - Carlton
>>
>> ==============================
>> Carlton A Samuels
>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>>
>> =============================
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Juan Manuel <jumaropi at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I only want to share you this article
>> >
>> > Could CISPA Be the Next SOPA?
>> > MASHABLE! | 8 DE ABRIL DE 2555 BE
>> > http://pulse.me/s/7X00y
>> >
>> >
>> > A bill introduced to the House of Representatives late last year could
>> > become the centerpiece of the next SOPA-style struggle between the tech
>> > commun... Read more
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent via Pulse
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> > lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>
>