[lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] Election NomCom lacralo

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

 And  Our ALAC  Chair  could also have made clear ALAC  can appoint someone
 NOT even ON a RALO list or recommended at all by a RALO process WE HAVE
done thag before and  certainly may again.  ALAC is driven by the ByLaw
requirements over all other things on this....

Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO)
ALAC Vice Chair


On 5 August 2011 09:09, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:

> Dear Carlos,
>
> this is not an electoral process. The process is the selection by the
> ALAC of a candidate to sit in the Nominating Committee. The selection
> will be undertaken by the ALAC. The RALOs can forward the list of
> candidates they suggest to the ALAC. There is actually no need to make a
> pre-selection and in fact, a RALO can send a list of more than one
> candidate to the ALAC.
> The RALO can send advice on as many or as few candidates to the ALAC as
> they want, but the final choice is made by the ALAC, not the RALOs.
>
> For your information, here is a copy of the by-laws regarding NomCom
> nominees:
>
> Section 4. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF NOMINATING COMMITTEE DELEGATES
>
> Delegates to the ICANN Nominating Committee shall be:
>
> 1. Accomplished persons of integrity, objectivity, and intelligence,
> with reputations for sound judgment and open minds, and with experience
> and competence with collegial large group decision-making;
> 2. Persons with wide contacts, broad experience in the Internet
> community, and a commitment to the success of ICANN;
> 3. Persons whom the selecting body is confident will consult widely and
> accept input in carrying out their responsibilities;
> 4. Persons who are neutral and objective, without any fixed personal
> commitments to particular individuals, organizations, or commercial
> objectives in carrying out their Nominating Committee responsibilities;
> 5. Persons with an understanding of ICANN's mission and the potential
> impact of ICANN's activities on the broader Internet community who are
> willing to serve as volunteers, without compensation other than the
> reimbursement of certain expenses; and
> 6. Persons who are able to work and communicate in written and spoken
> English.
>
> I hope this clears up any misunderstanding.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 04/08/2011 21:13, cveraq at gmail.com wrote :
> > On yesterday at 16h00 UTC the process was closed after 3 days of voting.
> In fact I verify this and the web site shows the word CLOSED
> >
> > After an email from Carlton the process is now open again! No questions
> asked!
> >
> > So quick, so bad
> >
> > Carlos Vera
> > Mensaje enviado desde mi terminal BlackBerry® de Claro
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: presidencia Internauta Argentina <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>
> > Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:09:05
> > To: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff at atlarge.icann.org>; <
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>; Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond<
> ocl at gih.com>
> > Reply-To: presidencia at internauta.org.ar
> > Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Election NomCom lacralo
> >
> > Estimates staff members: I am amazed at what I'm reading on a new
> > openness of the electoral process, you could give an explanation about
> > what happens in the election?
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>