[lac-discuss-en] a quick comment about Brussels GAC + Board meeting

[Cintra Sooknanan]

Dear Carlos and All,

I had previously undertaken to forward the GAC/Board meeting transcripts.

Please see http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/03/02/transcript-icann-gac-board which
is even better than the transcripts and sets out nicely the topics discussed
as well as the members that were most vocal.

Kind regards

Cintra Sooknanan

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:47 PM, carlos dionisio aguirre <
carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote:

>  Thanks Cintra. will be appreciated
>
>
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
> former ALAC member by LACRALO
> Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:04:59 -0400
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] a quick comment about Brussels GAC + Board
> meeting
> From: cintra.sooknanan at gmail.com
> To: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com
> CC: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
>
> Dear Carlos,
>
> I was present for both morning sessions (but missed the afternoon due to
> work), I am sharing my initial impressions but I would like to review the
> full transcript before giving a proper summary.
>
> Alot was discussed on the first day, at times it appeared that some of the
> GAC members were not as prepared as the Board members. The impression was
> that while they were very prepared in some areas, in others it seemed as if
> they want to institute restrictions but cannot suggest how the process
> should be modified. Worse yet, in some instances (eg. for generic words) it
> was felt that they want to go beyond what is present in existing
> legislation!
>
> The second day (today) has been a bit staggered, with a few initial
> speeches meant to refocus both groups on the contentious topic areas and a
> big gap during the day where both groups met separately (and no
> observers/remote participation was allowed).
>
> The transcripts will be available and I will be happy to forward them to
> the list (if staff does not do so).
>
> Kind regards
>
> Cintra Sooknanan
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:36 AM, carlos dionisio aguirre <
> carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear All: I`m seriously concerned, because I did not see any of our ALAC
> representatives in the adobe chat room this morning. I did not stay at
> consumer protection session, because I had another compromises. The present
> people in the Brussels GAC + Board meeting (adobe chat room), could
> summarize me what was on this session? I think is very important to know
> about this. Maybe Cynthia or Fatima, please? Was a really pity, didn`t see
> anyone our ALAC representatives there, maximum when they have
> responsabilities to inform us. I guess this meeting will be the point of
> central debate in San Francisco, for that we need an excerpt before the
> meeting. Perhaps we could elaborate some statement about that. whta do you
> think about that?
>
> Best Regards
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
> former ALAC member by LACRALO
> Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
>