[lac-discuss-en] Voting Director AT Large

[salgueiro.jo at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: Re: Voting Director AT Large
From: salgueiro.jo at gmail.com

I understand your position Sergio, but the subject is that whatis discussed here is 
another thing and I feel that it was not clear during this brief time of 
interchange of opinions. 
 
Beyond of which I am going to indicate now, the time to do something already expired. 
 
One never considered to vote neither by JJ Subrenat nor by Avri Doria.They only 
they requested support of our THIN one since with the support of 3 of the 5 THIN ones 
they could enter the list of candidates to be considered for the selection. 
 
In this opportunity we were not choosing to one on another one, we could have 
supported to both. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. 
salgueiro.jo at gmail.com  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Original -----Mensaje 
Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
[ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of 
Presidency Internaut 
Sent: Monday, 08 of November of 2010 08:13 p.m. 
It stops: Jose Ovid Salgueiro A.; cveraq at gmail.com; ' Andrés Piazzá; 
lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
CC: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large 
 
Dear Jose Ovid: Your email has made me reflect on some subjects 
that I create they must  
of being high-priority at the time of entering to raise us thesupport to some 
person stops  
to enter to board by the users. 
 
I understand that to who we give our endorsement him she must of beinga person with 
a fort loop  
with the end users of Internet. 
It must know in clearly that its function is to represent the users firmly 
and in freedom  
of action, with the only pressure of knowing how itself responsible to express opinions and 
positions  
that they respect them point of view that spill different the THIN ones. 
I am convinced that the work and the decisions that are taken in ALAC and in 
the THIN ones by  
part of the users doubtlessly benefits the organization, I believe that 
to understand that  
what one becomes for benefit of the users is against ICANN, us 
it puts in a place  
incomodo and very undesirable. 
 
I continue insisting like the first day that our organization entrancea 
ICANN, that I inhale a  
a cuatripartito and egalitarian Co-government (companies, users, sectors 
academic and  
governments), but I am not foolish and also it seems to me important first east 
passage of which they are  
1 voice against 22 or 23, since the important thing of that voice is that it can modify 
some  
position, can contribute with a glance of "user" the diverse forms of 
to see the "World  
of Internet ", mainly the one of the Names and Numbers of Dominion, and also 
that it can without  
place to doubts to cause that others to their side also accompany that same one 
position. 
 
I do not understand but that we are voting. 
It will be perhaps that we are voting the entrance of a person who is not going to have 
in account  
our vision, nor the necessities of the users? if it is thus sothat 
we would vote? 
We would be in that line of thought choosing to our twig? 
 
On the other hand I ask myself on this interchange of mails that is had 
happened in the list.  
There was no sufficient time so that are possible to be presented/displayed the candidates, 
There was also no a commission that I evaluate to those who appeared? 
It is good for the institucionalidad of ICANN that these three candidates 
present/display  
untimely and by outside the evaluation commission? (I create to understand 
that thus it was  
but it is thus I request excuses) 
With respect and cordiality 
Sergio Saline I carry 
 
Original Message  
 
From: "Jose Ovid Salgueiro A." <jsalgueiro at cantv.net> 
To: "' Internautá Presidency" <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>; 
<cveraq at gmail.com>;  
"' Andrés Piazzá" <andrespiazza at gmail.com>;  
<lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
Cc: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:47 A.M. 
Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large 
 
 
We must be clear in a thing, the cause that is a Director 
designated by the users it does not mean at all that it is there stops 
to protect to us or to benefit to us. According to the ICANN statutes the directors 
they are there for making the decisions that benefit the organization. 
 
Even though the designated director had interest in favoring the users 
(against the statutory forecasts), a vote of 22 or 23 is single. 
 
Said this, it wanted to mention both with respect to candidates who are 
asked for the support of the THIN one to be postulated, not even it stops 
to support them, that if it comes I am in agreement with Adrián as far as 
qualifications of Avri Doria, shine to me outside place to askfor support in one 
community which never it took care of and with that never it interacted, to difference 
of JJ Subrenat that if it always supported it and it interacted with her. 
 
We were few the members of the THIN one that we interacted with these people and 
for that reason I believe that feedback is important east. 
 
 
 
 
Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. 
salgueiro.jo at gmail.com 
 
 
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/09a7716e31.html
--]]