[lac-discuss-en] Voting Director AT Large

Tue Nov 9 15:25:58 UTC 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

Subject: Re: Voting Director AT Large
From: andrespiazza at gmail.com

Thanks Jose, that same one was what plenteé in 2 post office bilingues 
carefully written up. 

Not if it will have been understood. 

Andrés 

2010/11/9 Jose Ovid Salgueiro <salgueiro.jo at gmail.com> 
> Entiendo your position Sergio, but the subject is that what is discussed here is > another thing and I feel that it was not clear during this brief time of > interchange of opinions. > > Beyond of which I am going to indicate now, the time to do something already > expired. > > Never considered to vote neither by JJ Subrenat nor by Avri Doria. They > only > requested support of our THIN one since with the support of 3 of the 5 THIN ones > could enter the list of candidates to be considered for > selection. > > In this opportunity we were not choosing to one on another one, we could have > supported to both. > > > > > > > Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. > salgueiro.jo at gmail.com > > > > > > > > original -----Mensaje > Of: lac-discuss-he is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of > Presidency Internaut > Envoy: Monday, 08 of November of 2010 08:13 p.m. > For: Jose Ovid Salgueiro A.; cveraq at gmail.com; ' Andrés Piazzá; > l!
 ac-discuss-is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large > > Dear Jose Ovid: Your email has made me reflect on some subjects > that I create must > of being high-priority at the time of entering to raise us the support to some > person stops > to enter to board by the users. > > Entiendo that to that we give our endorsement him it must ofbeing a person with > a fort loop > with the end users of Internet. > Must know in clearly that its function is to represent the users firmly > and in freedom > of action, with the only pressure of knowing how itself responsible to express opinions > and > positions > that respects them point of view which the THIN ones are spilled different. > I am convinced that the work and the decisions that are taken in ALAC and in > the THIN ones by > part of the users doubtlessly benefits the organization, I believe that > to understand that > what one becom!
 es for benefit of the users is against ICANN, us > puts in a p!
 lace > i
ncomodo and very undesirable. > > Sigo insisting like the first day that our organization entrance a > ICANN, that I inhale a > a cuatripartito and egalitarian Co-government (companies, users, sectors > academic and > governments), but I am not foolish and also it seems to me important first east > passage of which they are > 1 voice against 22 or 23, since the important thing of that voice is that it can > to modify > some > position, can contribute with a glance of "user" the diverseforms of > to see the "World > of Internet ", mainly the one of the Names and Numbers of Dominion, and also > that can without > place to doubts to cause that others to their side also accompany that same one > position. > > I do not understand but that we are voting. > Will be perhaps that we are voting the entrance of a person who is not going to have > in account > our vision, nor the necessities of the users? if it is thus so that > we would vote? > We would be in that line of thought choos!
 ing to our twig? > > On the other hand I ask myself on this interchange of mails that is had > happened in the list. > was no sufficient time so that can be presented/displayed the candidates, > was also no a commission that I evaluate to those who appeared? > Is good for the institucionalidad of ICANN that these three candidates > presents/displays > untimely and by outside the evaluation commission? (I createto understand > that thus was > but is thus I request excuses) > With respect and cordiality > Sergio Saline I carry > > Original Message > > From: "Jose Ovid Salgueiro A." <jsalgueiro at cantv.net> > To: "' InternautÃ¡ Presidency" <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>; > <cveraq at gmail.com>; > "' AndrÃ©s PiazzÃ¡" <andrespiazza at gmail.com>; > <lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Cc: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:47 A.M. > Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large > > > Tenemos to be clear in a thing, th!
 e cause that is a Director > designated by the users does not !
 mean at 
all that it is there stops > to protect to us or to benefit to us. According to the ICANN statutes the directors > is there for making the decisions that benefit the organization. > > Even though the designated director had interest in favoring to > usuary > (against the statutory forecasts), is single a vote of 22 or 23. > > Said this, wanted to mention both with respect to candidates who are > asked for the support of the THIN one to be postulated, noteven stops > to support them, that if it comes I am in agreement with AdriÃ¡n as far as > qualifications of Avri Doria, shines to me outside place toask for support in one > community which never it took care of and with that never it interacted, a > difference > of JJ Subrenat that if it always supported it and it interacted with her. > > We were few the members of the THIN one that we interacted with these people and > for that reason I believe that feedback is important east. > > > > > Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. > salgueiro.jo!
 @gmail.com > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > > 

--  
* AndrÃ©s Piazza * 
www.andrespiazza.com 
_______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/982aa9a2a2.html
--]]