[lac-discuss-en] ¿Podría usted clarificar? =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F =

johnnylaureano at yahoo.com johnnylaureano at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 23 17:25:34 CDT 2010


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=BFPodr=EDa_usted_clarificar=3F __?= =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F =
From: johnnylaureano at yahoo.com

Dear friends, 
  
In teleconferencia del day of yesterday, many preoccupations were pronounced respect to the limited participation of the ALS of theregion, by communication problems I could not show a position on the matter, but I was listening to until the end the diverse commitments to obtain a greater participation of the leaders of the ALS, good intention that decays greatly with personal el cuestionamiento of Carlos Aguiire to our friend Antonio Medina (Pdte of ACUI), improper and treacherous cuestionamiento of a representative of a ALS against arepresentative of another ALS. 
  
Our Antonio friend,  ha informed on the position into the ACUI and have referred diverse connections where one can read all the antecedents that come executing the Colombian State like part from hisestrategia para el dominion ccTLD co.   
  
Some antecedents indicate the following thing: 
  
The failure of the Council of State of the 10 of July of 2002 ordered to the National Government - Ministry of Technologies of the Information and the Communications "to assume directly or by means of who it designates, within the pertinent legal frame, the administration and handling of dominio.co..."  
  
The Resolution 600 of 2002, by which the administration of dominio.co regulates itself partially established that the name of dominion of Internet, under the code of country corresponding to Colombia.co, is a resource of the sector of the telecommunications, ofpublic interest, whose administration, maintenance and development will be under the planning, regulation and control of the State, through the Ministry of Technologies of the Information and the Communications.  
  
  
It said it and it remembers to us, Jose Luis Barzallo, respectto the intervention limits of the ICANN and of the ALS including in our own countries,  resultado that I am safe they will reflect in the survey that come applying Rudi Vansnick from the relations between theALS and los ccTLD of the region. 
  
Perhaps he is opportune, in view of the results of this survey, from the point of view of the Latin American internauts, to develop an agenda with the LACTLD to raise alternatives and solutions that allow to a greater access to the dominions ccTLD of the region, considering the high costs and commercial strategies, based on their position of monopolies de facto (in Peru, for example). 
  
I am in agreement with most of the initiatives obtaining a greater participation of the spilled ALS the day of yesterday, but I am not in agreement with the irrespetuoso treatment of representativesof a ALS against a worthy one represents of the internauts of our brother country of Colombia, for that reason I want to express my shared in common endorsement to him. 
  
Kindly, 
  
Johnny Laureano 
AUI PERU - ALS 
  
  
  
  
 
--- On Fri, 4/23/10, carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote: 
 
 
From: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> 
Subject: Could you clarify? 
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Cc: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Date: Friday, April 23, 2010, 8:32 A.M. 
 
 
 
[ [ - - Translated text (in - &gt; is)--]] 
 
 
Subject: Could you clarify? 
Of: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com 
 
 
 
Dear Antonio. After the thought mentioned by Alex. Him desire also asking which is the ACUI position, when the Co now is administered by the company deprived with very diverse interests that users of the end, without the participation of the users of the end ina national Bussiness, and how can explain the fact that the Co will beuse like a cubical centimeter (national dominion of the identification), and the commercial identificator? I am really surprised for its words in the teleconferencing yesterday. Could you explain me? The situation is not clear and I worry for its representation of the users of the end. You are participating or some other delutilizador representative of the end in desitions of ccTLD ofthe Co? Which was the participation of the users of the end in definitions of the legal structure of ccTLD (also used like gTLD)? Of what maneraestán 
 protected rights of users of the end? You! 
  (same you or its ALS) receives a certain "contribution" of administrator of the Co? Why you made the propaganda of Co in facebook? Are you interested in a growth of the company? and in this case porqué?  
 
Carlos Aguirre  
 
_________________________________________________________________  
Easy very of he is of the meetings to organize with of Hotmailand Calendario: invitations and I received confirmations of attendanceof enviá.  
http://www.microsoft.com/latam/windows/windowslive/products/calendar.aspx  
_______________________________________________  
 
 
 
 
[ [ - - Original text (in) 
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ç7eb2fa78.html 
--]] 
 
 
 
 
-----Inline Attachment Follows 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/73ac191c35.html
--]]





More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list