[lac-discuss-en] declaration Brazil Internaut

Tue Jun 16 15:08:21 CDT 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

Subject: Re: declaration Brazil Internaut
From: andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com

Sylvia thanks, I am glad that that outside your answer. Not only by your own position but for the rest of the ALS, the summary he is very clarificador.  
 I believe that LACRALO must support this statement and I would like that we pruned to make an informal voting in the list, that simply expresses the general consensus of LACRALO.  

Since President I have been able to engage in a dialog with most of you and allow to say that this text of Cheryl, as Sylvia raises well, reflects most of our positions. 

Alexander Pisanty in his abstention from even showed his intention that yesterday he is not exactly this something that clears time and effort to us. I did not listen to substantial objections this text.  

If it seems to them, we can have a consensus to support statement. Youwill say. 

Greetings 

Andrés Piazza 
President of LACRALO 
> From: sylvia at internautabrasil.org > To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:59:17 -0300 > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] declaration Brazil Internaut >  > Dear companions,  >  > In the teleconferencing I yesterday committed myself to senda declaration > explaining the abstention from Brazil Internaut... >  > is Here: >  >   >  > Sabemos that ICANN from the beginning of the existence of the Thin ones has done and > continues making great investments to make participate and listen to the voice > of the End users of Internet.  >  > Also we know of the wonderful and untiring work that the president of > ALAC, Cheryl, comes making.  >  > Our abstention in the voting made in the Teleconferencing, was > the fear of the nonpossibility of participating in the Meetings of ICANN in his > totality when these are made in our region. Since we considered of > vital importance of participating nonsingle in the General Assembly like of > factories that are organ!
 ized, as well as of the Public Forum; being this the only one > opportunity to interact with the Board.  >  > and this fear is founded:  >  > 1) in the reality of year 2008, when the LACRALO could not make his > General Assembly not to be specifically solicitd to be including > in the budget of that year.  >  > 2) In the reading of page 7 of the following document, > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/travel-support/draft-travel-support-guideline > s-27may09-en.pdf >  > 3) And by vague commentary-answer given by Kevin Wilson whenhim > I commented on our preoccupation in the sense that the representatives > of the single ALSs would have the opportunity to participatein the Assemblies > General and not of the totality the meeting when these are made in > our region. As you can see in: > https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?draft_fy10_operating_plan_and_budget_11_ > june_2009 >  >   >  > Rereading the document > http://www.atlarge.icann.org/files/atlarge/alac-travel-policy-for-volu!
 nteers > -24mar09-en.pdf, we see that these points are being c!
 onsidere
d reason why > Brazil Internaut retires the abstention to the document showed yesterday, 15 of > June in the monthly teleconferencing of the LACRALO. And we supported the document > proposed by the president of Alac, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, referring to > support of trips for the voluntary members of ALAC. >  >   >  > immediately,  >  > Sylvia Herlein Leite >  > Brazil Internaut >  >   >  >   >  >   >  >  >  >   >  

_________________________________________________________________ 
Stay up to dates on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Live Windows 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/ 
_______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/09c8e43122.html
--]]