[lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?La_participaci=F3n_de_LACRALO_=28 = =?iso-8859-1?q?carencia_de=29_publica =

Jacqueline A. Morris jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Sun Nov 2 09:26:04 EST 2008


Dear Sergio
As I cannot translate into Spanish, as that is not a language I have 
learnt, I hope that someone bilingual (English -Spanish) on the list 
sees and responds to your request. I presume by this request that the 
automatic translation failed?
Jacqueline
presidencia at internauta.org.ar wrote:
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>
> Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?La_participaci=F3n_de_LACRALO_=28 = =?iso-8859-1?q?carencia_de=29_publica =
> From: to presidencia at internauta.org.ar
>
> Dear Jackelyn, I do not understand what you mean, you can be but clear? the translator no  
> he allows that comprenderte can clearly and I do not want to answer before without being safe of  
> what your you say, pídele to some companion ours of Hispanic speech that translates it if it is  
> difficult for you to be able to do it. 
>  
> I am thankful to you 
>  
> Sergio 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Original Message  
> From: <jam at jacquelinemorris.com> 
> To: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 9:20 A.M. 
> Subject: The participation of LACRALO (deficiency of) publishes 
>   
>>> [ [ - - Translated text (in - &gt; is)--]] > > > Subject: The participation of LACRALO (deficiency of) publishes > Of: jam at jacquelinemorris.com > > Envie' the email down quoted to the LACQUER I absolutely discuss the list does awhile. > Unfortunately, I have still not seen any improvement in this situation, like > a single post still has not been made to the list in anyone of > substantivas editings of policy that I enumerated. > Nevertheless, has been a certain discussion on the participation of ALAC minute > procedures. > * > * Also I observe that I have not heard much on minimum of LACRALO > participation that to me is a great question for the discussion > dull leading of the discussion of the participation of ALAC: > > * How little participation if LACRALO allows before applying > internal sanctions (is to say before it reaches the stage where ALAC > of-certificara' a ALS)? that is - which are the minimum of LACRALO > requisite of the participation? Observe that the !
>>>       
>  participation of ALAC minute > the requirements are in line in > http://www.atlarge.icann.org/en/framework.htm#minimumcriteria - > and is few enough ones! > * Must have minimum requirements of the participation? > * If a ALS representative is not participating, what tin LACRALO does > indicates to the ALS that his representative is risking his ALS 
> perhaps &gt; the certification and suggests strongly change to the person? > > is 2 years. There is some ALSes that looks like to have fallen extinguished > the Earth face since sao Paulo - I have not heard, seen, obtained nobodies > indication of its existence since then. I am safe that equalit maintains stops > other regions. > So > More questions for the discussion: > > * Would be better to have little active ALSes that one listsreleases of > the inactive ones? > * How it does this affects exceed efforts - it must in great changing > anyway exceeds to obtain ALSes to that it is more probable > participates, and throughout these lines, how on a study to determine itself > the characteristics of the organizations who have participated > successfully and work on ways to anyone: > or approaches and recruit more "guessed right" groups like > or creates processes to obtain to all the aspirings of ALS "even guessed right > way of the participation "- perhaps" a training rolls "p!
>  rogram or > a model mentoring of the organization... > > But in view of the session passed over the report of the consultation of Midâ?point of > the group of operation of the overhaul of committee ALAC of the government of the card in  > ALAC > Improvements - the participation of the ALSes is an important editing in > success or incident of the ALAC model, is urgent and vital that this > considérese in the level of THIN. > > ICANN is an organization who is fixing the policy now. LACRALO is > not to provide to the entrance of information in those policies. The whole end, and  > ONLY > indicates, of being a ALS is to provide to the entrance of information in those processes of  > political. > If LACRALO does not do this, later all the work that I made try to fix > for above (along with Sebastian, Erick, Jacob and Pablo) would have been lost. > > Now, I admit that there has been commentary and discussion many > in the reasons of the deficiency of the participation in thepast!
>  , being centered mainly > around the deficiency of translation!
>  s to the
>  Spanish and Portuguese. Others > the problem is education in editings. > Nevertheless, with respect to the education publishes, I I would saythat they are > solved at least partially, at least of the face deICANN, since there is > the information (in multiple languages and filed) in most ofthese > the editings, and questions can be done in the list of the discussion > clarification, explanation, etc. I doubt rather that informed > the members of the list (or the personnel of ICANN) to rechazaríanasistir inside > to explain the most technical or darker ends (or still most basic > ends) IF IT IS REQUESTED. > > With respect to the language publishes, although the translations and > the interpretation is high in agenda of ICANN's, are sidomuchos there of > requests of the personnel for the aid of fast and dirty the community re > translations et cetera. Nevertheless, there have been few public answers a > this - there have been some translations of the editing community done th!
>  at > is determined interesting (based on the number of posts) ready wing, > but is not many. > > Also would add that there was an invitation of the personnelof ICANN (Doug and > Denise) to the community to hook to a discussion on the participation, > what people think she needs, require what resources. That > the invitation was translated to the French and Spanish. Still it does not have been > responded a. > > the LACRALO has been in place from 2006 - for THIN the oldest one, that > false bitten to keep saying - we are learning, we are new, we  > we are > now beginning... must first the THIN one not lead? > > Jacqueline To Morris > > > Jacqueline To Morris wrote: &gt; is interesting &gt; LACRALO has not had no  > discussion on the list on nobodies of editings &gt; puts to the ALAC for  > commentaries, for example &gt; Fast Flux &gt; Amendments of RAA &gt;activities of  > transference of the secretary and period degracia of the rescue &gt; Improvements of GNSO &gt; IDN  > &!
>  gt; IPv6 ayunan track for ccTLDs &gt; front operation of the D!
>  omain Na
> me &gt;  > geographic regions &gt; DNSSEC and the correction of the envenenamiento of the DNS &gt; &gt; but  > we has many of the discussion on the reductions of the route and &gt; selection. > &gt; what makes that opinion on interest and priorities of LACRALÓs? &gt;&gt; Jacqueline &gt; &gt;  > &gt; &gt; &gt; > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/6e'e596ëa.html > --]] > > > > 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
>
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/d98d3ae49a.html
> --]]
>
>
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>   





More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list