[EURO-Discuss] [EURO-ALS] Voting Porcedure

[Rudi Vansnick]

Dear all,

Can we please proceed as has been defined, written on paper, agreed 
during Lisbon meetings and signed on the 29th or later by electronic 
signature ? Following this mailing list, the debates and long 
discussions are so time consuming that at the end I'm wondering why we 
have decided to start the Euralo ? If we are going to continue as we 
have been doing till today, I'm afraid we will never listen to the 
desire of the individual Internet user, as he/she can express so many 
different needs and comments.

I dare hope everyone will point his/her noose in the same direction as 
soon as possible. I have already received several questions from the 
individual Internet user, who found out that EURALO, and of course our 
ALS, is open for comments from the public and should be operational. 
That is at least the message seen by the public, they don't see the 
ongoing discussions (luckily they don't).

Please may I ask gently to stop putting question marks behind every 
message send to the list ?

Let us work ... my sleeves are already up ... let's do something please

Best regards,

Rudi Vansnick
Chair ISOC Belgium


Nick Ashton-Hart schreef:
> Verner:
>
> Thank you for your note. The first vote will be to decide whether or
> not the single ALS who is not a party to the MoU will be voting on the
> ALAC members and the board members.
>
> That vote will start today.
>
> With respect to the ranking system: This is what was decided in Lisbon
> as the procedure to be used, and so that procedure is carried forward
> to the actual vote. It is the same process that was strongly
> recommended with respect to the board seats, so on a practical level
> it makes sense to use only one type of voting on one ballot to reduce
> confusion.
>
> On 11/05/07, W.Hülsmann (DVD e.V.) <huelsmann op datenschutzverein.de> wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> on https://st.icann.org/euralo/index.cgi?euralo_elections_2007 I read:
>>
>> "VOTERS: The designated voters (1 per ALS) of ALSes who have signed the
>> Memorandum of Understanding with ICANN either in-person at the Lisbon
>> ICANN meeting or digitally via electronic mail - at any time before the
>> beginning of the voting"
>>
>> There must be a mistake: First of all we have to decide, if this "strong
>> recommendation" will be accepted.
>>
>> Next: If there are two seats we have to vote for ALAC, then every voter
>> should have two possible votes. The two candidates with the most votes
>> will be elected. This is the democratical way of election. There ist no
>> need for such a ranking.
>>
>> After the election of the two members for the ALAC seats we have two
>> decide, how many seats shall the EURALO board have. The election of the
>> EURALO boad members can't start before we know how many board members
>> are to elect.
>>
>> Kind Regarts,
>>
>> Werner Hülsmann
>>
>>
>> ####################################################
>> Vorratsdatenspeicherung? Nein Danke!  -  Noch ist es
>> nicht zu spät: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de
>> ####################################################
>>
>> --
>>
>> Dipl. Inform. Werner Hülsmann
>> Vorstandsmitglied der Deutschen Vereinigung für Datenschutz (DVD) e.V.
>> Obere Laube 48 - D-78462 Konstanz
>> Tel.: 07531 / 365905-6 Mobil: 0179 / 46 86 484
>> E-Mail: huelsmann op datenschutzverein.dehttp://www.datenschutzverein.de
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EURO-ALS mailing list
>> EURO-ALS op atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-als_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>>     
>
>
>