[At-Large] DomainIncite : Is this why WhatsApp hates some TLDs but not others?
bzs at theworld.com
bzs at theworld.com
Sat Sep 16 04:34:50 UTC 2023
I would have to sit down and read the text and hear the arguments but
they seem like reasonable proposals from your description. I suppose
at this point it's not a good use of time.
On September 15, 2023 at 12:58 carlton.samuels at gmail.com (Carlton Samuels) wrote:
> If you missed it, after a year in pending status, the ICANN Board just voted to
> reject Recs 14 & 15 from the CCT Review. These were offered for
> mitigating systemic DNS security abuse.
>
> #14 recommends amendments offering incentives - inclusive of financial ones -
> in the [RA/RAA] Agreements for the contracted parties adopting proactive
> anti-abuse measures. Nothing too heretical.
>
> #15 recommends amendments to [RA/RAA] Agreements that establish thresholds of
> abuse at which compliance inquiries are automatically triggered and a higher
> one at which registrars and registries are presumed to be in default of their
> agreements.
>
> We went on to recommend a community-developed DNS Abuse Dispute Resolution
> Policy (DADRP) if ICANN Compliance falls asleep on the enforcement job. [The
> text delicately eased into that like only "...if the community determines that
> ICANN org itself is ill-suited or unable to enforce such provisions."]
>
> In my own view #14 is something regulators do with concessionaires time and
> again. Even the "light touch and by suasion" telecoms ones I know well in my
> home region.
>
> Our ICANN don't play that!
>
> Carlton
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 20:33, Barry Shein via At-Large <
> at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
>
>
> As a company which provides email and other internet services maybe if
> the new gTLDs agreements included some serious commitment to avoid
> allowing the use of these gTLDs for massive spamming and phishing etc
> maybe the service providers would have been more enthusiastic about
> acceptance.
>
> Unfortunately the opposite is true and many of these new gTlDs can
> safely be blocked in entirety, they just spew spam etc, with no
> customer complaints.
>
> I'll guess these new gTLD registrars/registries would complain that's
> not equitable since it's not required of other TLDs.
>
> Which is all a very nice argument to make sitting in an airless room
> somewhere.
>
> So instead they tend to get blocked and ignored, or at least marked
> "suspicious" by spam filters, but equitably!
>
> If I had a nickel for every ISP who said or recommended "oh just block
> all .pick-a-nGTLD, you and your customers will be happier"...
>
> --
> -Barry Shein
>
> Software Tool & Die | bzs at TheWorld.com | http://
> www.TheWorld.com
> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
> The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs at TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
More information about the At-Large
mailing list