[At-Large] Auction Proceeds - where we are and what you can help

Alberto Soto asoto at ibero-americano.org
Thu May 11 18:23:06 UTC 2017


Estimada Vanda, estoy de acuerdo con lo expresado por Eduardo.

Muchas corporaciones funcionan adecuadamente así.

Inclusive los límites de montos de dinero, y de esa forma queda determinado cuando puede hacerse algo directamente (compra directa), o cuando un concurso de precios, o cuando una licitación.

Eso aseguraría que en ICANN se realicen contrataciones transparentes, con conocimiento de la comunidad, y que aseguren a su vez, que quien sea contratado, reúna las condiciones profesionales y experiencia necesarias para cumplir el objetivo de ese  proyecto.

 

Saludos cordiales

 

Alberto

 

De: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Eduardo Diaz
Enviado el: Thursday, May 11, 2017 3:09 PM
Para: Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>; At-Large Worldwide <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Asunto: Re: [At-Large] Auction Proceeds - where we are and what you can help

 

Vanda:

 

My comments in RED.

 

-ed

 

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:48 AM Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org <mailto:vanda at scartezini.org> > wrote:

Dear colleagues ( Español abajo) 

 

Auction Proceed CCWG is the group dealing with the process that shall be follow for the financial resources from new gTLDs auctions as you remember.

We are in the phase of Auction Proceeds CCWG  where we need to focus on to relevant points that your ideas will be very welcome. See below the question and if you can comment I appreciate.

We are organizing a framework for this work,

 

*         As part of this framework, what will be the limitations of fund allocation, factoring in that the funds need to be used in line with ICANN’s mission while at the same time recognizing the diversity of communities that ICANN serves? This should include recommendations on how to assess whether the proposed use is aligned with ICANN’s Mission. Furthermore consideration is expected to be given to what safeguards, if any, need to be in place.

 

There should not be a limitation of fund allocations. However, you can use a series of tiers. FOr example:

 

Tier 1: $X - $Y

Tier 2: $Y+1 $#Z

 

and so forth.

 

For each tier there should be different requiuerements. These requirements should be more stringent as the $$ amount increases. 

 

Create a framework of interpretation around ICANN missions to help identify and guide if the money to be allocated is or is not in concordance with ICANN Mission. Such a framework is important to standarize the allocation process. A series of stress tests models should be created to validate the allocation

 

For example, it will be a requierement that for a $1,000,000 allocation (the amount is just for illustration purposes only) the community has to be involved in the final decision.

 

*         What aspects should be considered to define a timeframe, if any, for the funds allocation mechanism to operate as well as the disbursements of funds? E.g. The timeframe for the operation of this new mechanism may provide the opportunity for long term support, or for funding to be released in tranches linked to milestone achievements, single or multiple disbursements.

 

1. Determine fund allocation: 90 days max.

2. Allocate 30% funds at approval time

3. Disburse 40$% of the allocation using specific milestones for the duration of the project

4. Disburse the last 30% at completion

 

Use the aboe as a guideline and put a process in place to work with exceptions to the guideline.

 

Please feel free to enter in contact for any questions, comments etc. 

Appreciate 

 

 

Estimados colegas 

 

El grupo de procedimientos trabajando para definir cómo deben ser utilizados los recursos financieros advenidos de las subastas de new gTLDs, y estamos trabajando en la construcción de esta moldura.

 

• Como parte de este marco, ¿cuáles serán las limitaciones de la asignación de fondos, teniendo en cuenta que los fondos deben ser utilizados en consonancia con la misión de ICANN y al mismo tiempo reconocer la diversidad de comunidades que ICANN sirve? Esto debería incluir recomendaciones sobre cómo evaluar si el uso propuesto está alineado con la Misión de ICANN. Además, se espera que se preste atención a las medidas de salvaguardia que deben aplicarse, en su caso.

 

• ¿Qué aspectos deberían considerarse para definir un calendario, si existe alguno, para que el mecanismo de asignación de fondos funcione, así como los desembolsos de fondos? P.ej. El calendario para el funcionamiento de este nuevo mecanismo puede brindar la oportunidad de un apoyo a largo plazo, o de que la financiación se libere en tramos relacionados con logros de hitos, desembolsos únicos o múltiples.

 

Por favor siéntanse libres para hacer comentarios o preguntas.

Agradezco su participación. 

 

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004

01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <tel:+55%2011%203266-6253> 

Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <tel:+55%2011%2098181-1464>  

Sorry for any typos. 

HAPPY 2017!

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20170511/38cc8817/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the At-Large mailing list