[At-Large] Unsubscribe me please

Mon Feb 20 14:08:19 UTC 2017

Mail is a formal communication, *chat is informal. *What kind of
communication do we want to have, one with traceability or one that
responds to instantaneous and individual occurrences without tracking
capability?

Erik Huesca
Knowledge and Digital Culture Foundation

Erik S. Huesca
*F*undación para el *C*onocimiento y *C*ultura *D*igital (FUNCO)
www.funco.mx
erik at huesca.mx
erik at funco.mx
Móvil: + 55 26619243

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Rahul Srivastava via At-Large <
at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:

> Lets me contribute by proving some SOLUTION to this long debate of Mail
> issue.
>
> Certainly e-mails are just too old age technology to communicate within a
> large community. and to top of it when you allow everyone to send message
> to everyone it becomes too messy as it it right now since last two days.
>
> Messenger application is a better choice. However the most popular
> messaging platform whatsapp doesn’t offer any business solution. whatsapp
> group is certainly not what we can opt for reason being its group size of
> only 256 members and privacy issues that may arise from exposing mobile
> number of all members to everyone.
>
> There are few well know messaging platform like JioChat and wechat which
> let business and organisation create official channel. it let channel owner
> send message to each one follower and if a follower replies its visible
> only to channel owner. the channel owner can choose to distribute this
> response agin to all the followers.
>
> Best part is user's personal details like mobile number and e-mail is
> never exposed to anyone and these services comes with no cost.
>
> Regards
> rahul
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
> *To:* Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
> *Cc:* "at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> *Sent:* Monday, 20 February 2017 4:18 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [At-Large] Unsubscribe me please
>
> Agree Holly
> People are more and more focusing on instant messages but discuss several
> points become difficult using just Whattsapp like communications.
> There are some unnecessary emails we could avoid but as per example votes-
> we can do better using appropriate tools but do no means we shall ignore
> the relevance of discussion lists
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> Sent from my iPhone
> Sorry for typos
>
> On 19 Feb 2017, at 18:04, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Garth
>
> That isn’t sarcastic - it’s sad.  I am not talking about a big grand
> plan.  I am talking about a discussion on the lists - what are they, who
> uses them, is there a better way.  It could be a simple as eliminating one
> of the lists, or better labelling the lists, or simply putting a better
> subject heading.  Please let’s not step away from what may be small reforms
> because we have decided it is all too hard, and ICANN will can it.
>
> Holly
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 7:58 am, Gbruen <gbruen at knujon.com> wrote:
>
> Holly,
>
> This is going to sound sarcastic but it is simply factual. Me, Seun, and
> everyone else could collaborate and come up with a great plan and as soon
> as we try to move forward it will be taken over by some icann division and
> either get shelved, bloated, or made ineffective. This has already happened
> several time before with too many at-large projects.
>
> -Garth
>
>
> *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid*
> On Feb 19, 2017 2:34 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net> wrote:
>
> Folks
>
> A great discussion on this list - making some really important points.  So
> instead of letting the matter drop (as is so often the case), make this an
> item for discussion at CPH - and allow plenty of time.  How do we
> communicate, can we do better and how.
>
> So maybe review what some of us know - what are the lists, how are they
> used (or not), when people unsubscribe, do we try to find out why, is there
> a better way to communicate - by topic?  And Dev, Garth, Seun and everyone
> - could there be a page or so - to that list and staff, saying this is a
> better way and this is how to do it.
>
> We are starting the Review comments - and how we communicate (and how we
> could do it better) is clearly something that should be one of the  top
> items on that agenda.  So let’s actually make our communications structures
> better rather than just complain
>
> Thanks everyone
>
> Holly
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 4:57 am, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Oh good, then we can agree.
> R
>
>
> *Da:* gbruen at knujon.com [mailto:gbruen at knujon.com <gbruen at knujon.com>]
> *Inviato:* domenica 19 febbraio 2017 18:55
> *A:* Roberto Gaetano
> *Cc:*  <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20170220/652090ad/attachment.html>