[At-Large] What ALAC said about new gTLDs in 2003

[McTim]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Christian de Larrinaga
<cdel at firsthand.net> wrote:
> and the 2004 to date experience has shown that expansion predicated on a registry sponsor model is not workable in the context of the assumption that a domain name = trademark. The IPR issue blocks DNS name expansion. All we are seeing is the same old names in new tld's.  Not a helpful situation when naming resources are needed to support billions of new users and devices in an IPv6 scale Internet.

These "naming resources" don't need to be TLDs, do they?

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel