[ALAC] VOTE RESULTS for ALAC vote on the RoP Revision
h.raiche at internode.on.net
Mon Aug 22 06:06:21 UTC 2022
Thank you Alan for picking this up
I don’t think a recount is necessary at this stage; i think it would have little impact on the outcome. However, I do support that this be noted for the next revision
> On Aug 22, 2022, at 2:33 PM, Alan Greenberg via ALAC <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
> As I was creating the finale approved version of the RoP, I realized that I had made an error. During the last review, Sebastien had suggested that the ALAC Member seconding the motion to reappoint the Board Member should be from a different region. There was no objection and I readily agreed to make that change. However, I never did.
> Although the omission does not alter the final impact of such a motion, I agreed with Sebastien that it set the right tone. I'm not sure it is worth redoing the vote to correct my mistake, but that is certainly possible.
> Alternatively, I would suggest that this be noted for the next revision, and if such a motion is made in the interim, I would suggest that the Chair ensure that there is multi-region support prior to initiating discussion of the motion.
> At 2022-08-16 01:20 AM, ICANN At-Large Staff via ALAC wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> Following the close of the ALAC vote on the ALAC Rules of Procedure (RoPs) revision, the revisions have been adopted with option B (Super Majority).
>> Please see the detailed vote results below:
>> ALAC vote on the RoP Revision.
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ALAC