[ALAC] VOTE RESULTS for ALAC vote on the RoP Revision
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Aug 22 04:33:38 UTC 2022
As I was creating the finale approved version of the RoP, I realized
that I had made an error. During the last review, Sebastien had
suggested that the ALAC Member seconding the motion to reappoint the
Board Member should be from a different region. There was no
objection and I readily agreed to make that change. However, I never did.
Although the omission does not alter the final impact of such a
motion, I agreed with Sebastien that it set the right tone. I'm not
sure it is worth redoing the vote to correct my mistake, but that is
Alternatively, I would suggest that this be noted for the next
revision, and if such a motion is made in the interim, I would
suggest that the Chair ensure that there is multi-region support
prior to initiating discussion of the motion.
At 2022-08-16 01:20 AM, ICANN At-Large Staff via ALAC wrote:
>Following the close of the ALAC vote on the ALAC Rules of Procedure
>(RoPs) revision, the revisions have been adopted with option B
>Please see the detailed vote results below:
>ALAC vote on the RoP Revision.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ALAC