[ALAC] VOTE RESULTS for ALAC vote on the RoP Revision

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Aug 22 04:33:38 UTC 2022

As I was creating the finale approved version of the RoP, I realized 
that I had made an error. During the last review, Sebastien had 
suggested that the ALAC Member seconding the motion to reappoint the 
Board Member should be from a different region. There was no 
objection and I readily agreed to make that change. However, I never did.

Although the omission does not alter the final impact of such a 
motion, I agreed with Sebastien that it set the right tone. I'm not 
sure it is worth redoing the vote to correct my mistake, but that is 
certainly possible.

Alternatively, I would suggest that this be noted for the next 
revision, and if such a motion is made in the interim, I would 
suggest that the Chair ensure that there is multi-region support 
prior to initiating discussion of the motion.


At 2022-08-16 01:20 AM, ICANN At-Large Staff via ALAC wrote:

>Dear All,
>Following the close of the ALAC vote on the ALAC Rules of Procedure 
>(RoPs) revision, the revisions have been adopted with option B 
>(Super Majority).
>Please see the detailed vote results below:
>ALAC vote on the RoP Revision.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20220822/acbd635f/attachment.html>

More information about the ALAC mailing list