[ALAC] [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69 Topic Proposal: The Domain Name Services Marketplace

Joanna Kulesza jkuleszaicann at gmail.com
Wed Aug 12 08:53:16 UTC 2020


Hi all,

my two cents:

*Proposed Session Title * Beyond Budapest: the UN cybercrime treaty and 
DNS Abuse **
*

Brief Description (max 250 words) * This session looks into the progress 
and perspectives of the proposed UN cybercrime treaty and explores how 
it might impact ICANN’s mission. Its point of departure will be the 
recent reports from ICANN’s UN engagement team < 
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/un-update-cyber-related-discussions-15jul20-en.pdf 
 >. It seeks to explore whether the ongoing UN discussions impact 
ICANN’s understanding of DNS abuse such as CASM, online fraud or any 
other online activity the community considers harmful. We would also 
like to take this opportunity to look at the international cybercrime 
treaty already in place: the CoE Budapest convention and what mechanisms 
it offers to effectively protect internet users from DNS related abuse.  
We would like to invite speakers from the UN engagement team to give the 
background for our discussions, welcome representatives from the Council 
of Europe (GAC observer) as well as from the contracted parties 
community to discuss the DNS Abuse framework.
Rationale/Desired Outcomes * We’re seeking to answer the following 
questions: How does DNS Abuse fit in with existing cybercrime 
frameworks, both: national and international? Can cybercrime laws be 
useful for fighting DNS Abuse? What are the opportunities for having the 
ICANN voice heard in international cybercrime discussions? We will also 
seek to identify opportunities for enhanced ICANN community input into 
this and similar processes that directly impact the effectiveness of our 
DNS Abuse mechanisms.
Session Format * Panel discussion
Session Leaders/Facilitators * To be confirmed
Community Interest * Community wide as is DNS Abuse

*Proposed Session Title: EU’s Digital Services Act – a new GDPR in the 
making?**
*Brief Description (max 250 words) * Following the recent report from 
the IGO Engagement team on the EU Digital Services Act we would like to 
explore the challenges and opportunities this EU legislation holds for 
the ICNN Community. Learning from the GDPR experience, we would like to 
understand and prepare for any similar challenge in terms of contracted 
parties obligations and ICANN policy development processes. With the DNS 
Abuse framework still under discussion, we would like to identify any 
potential legal duties that might fall onto community members in EU and 
beyond should this legislation become binding. As explained in the IGO 
report: “Within  the  DNS  ecosystem,  registrars  could  be affected.  
ICANN’s  Registrar  Accreditation Agreement already provides that 
registrars shall be able to receive and act upon notification of 
providers of illegal content “by law enforcement, consumer protection, 
quasi-governmental or other similar authorities.” Under the DSA, digital 
services providers would be required to extend such notification systems 
to the general public, for reporting unwanted content.”
Rationale/Desired Outcomes * This session seeks to spread awareness of 
this EU originated activity and its potential impact. We would like to 
welcome ICANN’s IGO team representative, European Commission as well as 
members from the contracted parties community, likely impacted by the 
legislation.
Session Format * Panel discussion
Session Leaders/Facilitators * To be confirmed
Community Interest * Community wide

Thanks for consdiering!

J.

W dniu 11.08.2020 o 18:59, Maureen Hilyard pisze:
> Don't forget there are three plenary sessions and therefore we need a 
> good number of topics from which to make our final selection.
>
> Jonathan Robinson's was the first proposal to come in, so ICANN needs 
> at least two more. All ideas welcome, but we must use the formal 
> proposal form with its full explanation.
>
> M
>
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2020, 3:53 am Marita Moll, <mmoll at ca.inter.net 
> <mailto:mmoll at ca.inter.net>> wrote:
>
>     I think both are good but  I lean towards the first suggestion
>     which I think would be more productive in terms of informing
>     participants about what is happening.
>
>     The second one is very broad -- overwhelming -- maybe that's the
>     point. But will it lead to a productive discussion on how to deal
>     with the volume? Doubtful -- a lot of hand wringing probably.
>
>     Marita
>
>     On 8/11/2020 1:59 AM, Holly Raiche wrote:
>>     Very helpful from my pint of view.
>>
>>     I like both.
>>
>>     On the first - I’m not sure that the security people will REALLY
>>     tell you what information they can still get.  That said, process
>>     have had to change/adapt
>>
>>     And i like the se3cond.  Imagine starting with a slide that
>>     listed all the recommendations from all the review! (the list
>>     would have to cover at least 2-3 slides, with the text in 9 point
>>     font.)
>>
>>     Holly
>>
>>>     On Aug 11, 2020, at 3:52 PM, Jonathan Zuck
>>>     <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org
>>>     <mailto:JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Consumer Protection Post EPDP
>>>     In this session, we’ll explore how things have changed since
>>>     ICANN’s implementation of the Temporary Specification to comply
>>>     with the GDPR. We’ll hear from Consumer Protection
>>>     Professionals, Cybersecurity Researchers and Corporate Fraud
>>>     Prevention Experts on how the massive changes to WHOIS have
>>>     impacted their work and their ability to get the necessary data
>>>     from contracted parties or find alternatives. We will also
>>>     invite speakers from the Registrar community to share their
>>>     experiences with data requests during that same time. Is the
>>>     volume overwhelming, are the requests poorly scoped?  How does
>>>     the this small slice of consumer protection look going forward?
>>>     Recommendation Trepidation
>>>     The community is now looking at literally hundreds of
>>>     recommendations that have been made by various WGs and RTs. 
>>>     What does that landscape look like and how do we resolve
>>>     conflicts and prioritize the rest? We’ll have representatives
>>>     from the board, ATRT3 and some of the WGs and RTs that made
>>>     these recommendations to begin to look at the state of “reform”
>>>     inside ICANN, post the recommendations of ATRT3
>>>     Helpful?
>>>     Jonathan
>>>     *From:*Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>>
>>>     *Date:*Monday, August 10, 2020 at 8:59 PM
>>>     *To:*ALAC <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>     <mailto:alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>>, Jonathan Zuck
>>>     <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org
>>>     <mailto:JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>>, Joanna Kulesza
>>>     <jkuleszaicann at gmail.com <mailto:jkuleszaicann at gmail.com>>
>>>     *Subject:*Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69
>>>     Topic Proposal: The Domain Name Services Marketplace
>>>     Anyone got a proposal in mind for a plenary topic from At-Large?
>>>     Jonathan Robinson's proposal is attached for your reference: the
>>>     Domain Name Services Marketplace.
>>>     Our completed proposal (if forthcoming) is due by 13th Aug.
>>>     M
>>>
>>>     ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>     From:*Tanzanica S. King*<tanzanica.king at icann.org
>>>     <mailto:tanzanica.king at icann.org>>
>>>     Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
>>>     Subject: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69 Topic
>>>     Proposal: The Domain Name Services Marketplace
>>>     To: SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>>>     <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>>>     <mailto:soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>>
>>>
>>>     Dear Community Leaders:
>>>     Please see the first plenary session topic proposed for ICANN69
>>>     below.
>>>     *As a reminder, please submit topic proposals via theICANN69
>>>     Plenary Topic Proposal Form [icann.wufoo.com]
>>>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.wufoo.com/forms/plenary-session-topic-proposal-form-69__;!!PtGJab4!p8ilFhA0tSf1XWo-9Rw96TDwPqykkTWVsjM33rPYuyiFtnLwZhhQDC3x9XlQcmseX4i2L_MnLw$>by
>>>     Thursday, 13 August @ 7:00 UTC for discussion during the
>>>     planning call this week.*
>>>     **
>>>     Best,   Tanzanica
>>>     *Plenary Session Topic Proposal Form (69)*
>>>     *Group/Affiliation******
>>>     	
>>>     GNSO RySG
>>>     *Contact Name******
>>>     	
>>>     Jonathan Robinson <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>
>>>     *Proposed Session Title******
>>>     	
>>>     *The Domain Name Services Marketplace (Market dynamics, business
>>>     models and commercial drivers)*
>>>     *Brief Description (max 250 words)******
>>>
>>>     An education, outreach and engagement session from the ICANN
>>>     Contracted Parties (Registries && Registrars). The session aims
>>>     to improving broader community understanding of the key dynamics
>>>     of the industry sector on which the finances of ICANN and the
>>>     ICANN community are based. Generic Top Level Domain Registries
>>>     and Registrars occupy a unique position within the ICANN
>>>     community in that they are directly contracted with ICANN.
>>>     Moreover, ICANN's current funding model depends on the
>>>     commercial success these domain name businesses. This session
>>>     will provide insights into the current marketplace for domain
>>>     names and related services as well as the dynamics driving
>>>     change within that market place. Second, it will provide insight
>>>     into the various business models of service providers within the
>>>     marketplace and the key drivers of these business models. Third,
>>>     it will create the opportunity for questions, answers and
>>>     discussions around key business and economic aspects of the
>>>     businesses and how these may need to be considered within the
>>>     broader ICANN Community and policy making functions. In addition
>>>     to the development of the market, topics such as the secondary
>>>     market for domain names, approaches to abuse and issues with
>>>     resellers will be covered by Registrars. From Registries,
>>>     consideration will be given to the different approaches generic
>>>     (open) TLDs, brand TLDs and geographic TLDs, as well as key
>>>     contractual requirements.
>>>
>>>     This session was originally proposed and accepted for ICANN 67
>>>
>>>     *Rationale/Desired Outcomes******
>>>
>>>     A recent session targeted at ensuring that ICANN Board members
>>>     have a robust understanding of the variety of Registrar and
>>>     Registry approaches to the marketplace was very well-received.
>>>     Following on from the session with the ICANN Board it was
>>>     proposed that a similar, expanded and interactive session with
>>>     the broader community could provide good value to all. Policy
>>>     making that is well-informed by fact is clearly optimal. Such
>>>     policy making includes having the best access to all data
>>>     including an understanding of the commercial drivers of the
>>>     protagonists. The domain name services sector has seen far
>>>     reaching changes take place over a number of years including the
>>>     development of a range a diversity of business models within
>>>     both Registry and Registrar business. Extensive competition has
>>>     developed in some areas and substantial consolidation and
>>>     corporate transactions continue to take place. The broader ICANN
>>>     community will benefit from an understanding of the key
>>>     marketplace drivers and dynamics when considering all future
>>>     policy, including high-profile current issues such as future
>>>     rounds of new gTLDs.
>>>
>>>     *Session Format******
>>>     	
>>>     Given the outreach and informative nature of the session, it is
>>>     expected that it will be biased towards presentation of
>>>     material. But, additional emphasis will be placed on question,
>>>     answer and discussion. Further, organisers will be receptive to
>>>     any other techniques to drive levels of interactivity.
>>>     *Session Leaders/Facilitators******
>>>     	
>>>     To be confirmed
>>>     *Community Interest******
>>>     	
>>>     Broad. As above, the business and commercial drivers of the
>>>     registry and registrar businesses underpin their own finances as
>>>     well as those of the ICANN Organisation as a whole. This is a
>>>     crucial pillar of understanding for the broad community and so
>>>     interest is expected to be high and broad.
>>>
>>>     *Error! Filename not specified.*
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Tanzanica S. King
>>>     Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design
>>>     ICANN
>>>     Office   +1 310 301 5800
>>>     Mobile  +1 310 995 3038
>>>     www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning mailing list
>>>     SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning at icann.org
>>>     <mailto:SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning at icann.org>
>>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing
>>>     of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this
>>>     mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>>>     (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>>>     Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>>>     Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>>>     configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>>>     delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a
>>>     vacation), and so on.
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     ALAC mailing list
>>>     ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>
>>>     At-Large Online:http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>>     <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>>>     ALAC Working
>>>     Wiki:https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing
>>>     of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this
>>>     mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>>>     (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>>>     Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>>>     Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>>>     configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>>>     delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a
>>>     vacation), and so on.
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     ALAC mailing list
>>     ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org  <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>>     At-Large Online:http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>     ALAC Working Wiki:https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>     _______________________________________________
>     ALAC mailing list
>     ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>     At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>     ALAC Working Wiki:
>     https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>     _______________________________________________
>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>     your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing
>     list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>     (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>     Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>     Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>     configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>     delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
>     and so on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-- 
Kind regards,
Joanna Kulesza
-------------------
Joanna Kulesza, PhD
University of Lodz, Poland
ICANN ALAC Vice Chair
SOI: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Joanna+Kulesza+SOI
TT: @KuleszaJ

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20200812/27f615ba/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list