[ALAC] What to cover re GDPR in the HIT sessions?

[Satish Babu]

Hi Maureen,

My choices are 9, 13 and 12.








satish

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Maureen,
>
> I don't know who wrote the attached document but I like the first option
> which suggests a combination of a couple of related topics and that would
> be my preference.
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my mobile
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, 01:53 Maureen Hilyard, <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Attached is a list of topics from which the SO/AC chairs are considering
>> a final list for inclusion into ICANN63 HIT slots.
>>
>> Can you send me what you consider would be your top 2-3 topics? Not
>> possible to cover everything. Id like to survey what the ALAC considers
>> should be our suggested list (within the next 2-3 days?)
>>
>> M
>>
>> Austin, Donna via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>> [image: Attachments]Aug 8 (2 days ago)
>> to SOAC-Leaders-I.
>>
>> Hi Everyone
>>
>>
>>
>> Following on from the Planning Committee Meeting last week, where I
>> agreed that I would reach out to those that submitted GDPR related topic
>> proposals to see if we could find a way to rationalize these sessions in
>> some way, unfortunately I have to report that I have not had much success.
>> I reached out to those that had submitted the GDPR related sessions to see
>> if there was some way that we could consolidate five of the proposed topics
>> (see attached), but have yet to receive any response so I’ll put this down
>> to ‘that time of year’. Understanding that there is some urgency to resolve
>> this to enable us to move forward with the planning for Barcelona I have
>> attached the proposal that I developed.
>>
>>
>>
>> I also contacted Bruce Tonkin to see if he would be available to
>> moderate/facilitate a consolidated session and he is available if that is
>> something folks want to consider.
>>
>>
>>
>> I also spoke to Tanzie and there is some flexibility in the schedule, for
>> example, it might be possible to schedule a 2 hour session on Wednesday
>> from 10.00 to 12.00, but my strong preference would be to have a 90 minute
>> session as I think 2 hours is probably too much. Perhaps another option, if
>> those that submitted the proposals don’t want to combine their sessions, is
>> to allocate 30 minute slots (that would mean cutting one of the sessions).
>> Of course that doesn’t really help overcome the problem of reducing the
>> number of Topic Proposals to fit the number of slots available.
>>
>>
>>
>> In thinking about the meeting schedule from a holistic perspective, it’s
>> my personal opinion that 7 sessions devoted to GDPR is too many. There’s no
>> doubt that it is a ‘hot topic’, but we should be mindful that there are a
>> number of other efforts and issues that also require some air time as well
>> and with limited time available we should be respectful of the large number
>> of community members that will be attending the meeting that may have no
>> interest in the topic.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m not sure what our next steps are for winnowing down the Topic
>> Proposals. Perhaps Tanzie can remind us.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks everyone.
>>
>>
>>
>> Donna
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+
>> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+
> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180810/7c568c5f/attachment.html>