[ALAC] What to cover re GDPR in the HIT sessions?

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Fri Aug 10 06:24:59 UTC 2018


Hello Maureen,

I don't know who wrote the attached document but I like the first option
which suggests a combination of a couple of related topics and that would
be my preference.

Regards

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, 01:53 Maureen Hilyard, <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Attached is a list of topics from which the SO/AC chairs are considering a
> final list for inclusion into ICANN63 HIT slots.
>
> Can you send me what you consider would be your top 2-3 topics? Not
> possible to cover everything. Id like to survey what the ALAC considers
> should be our suggested list (within the next 2-3 days?)
>
> M
>
> Austin, Donna via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
> [image: Attachments]Aug 8 (2 days ago)
> to SOAC-Leaders-I.
>
> Hi Everyone
>
>
>
> Following on from the Planning Committee Meeting last week, where I agreed
> that I would reach out to those that submitted GDPR related topic proposals
> to see if we could find a way to rationalize these sessions in some way,
> unfortunately I have to report that I have not had much success. I reached
> out to those that had submitted the GDPR related sessions to see if there
> was some way that we could consolidate five of the proposed topics (see
> attached), but have yet to receive any response so I’ll put this down to
> ‘that time of year’. Understanding that there is some urgency to resolve
> this to enable us to move forward with the planning for Barcelona I have
> attached the proposal that I developed.
>
>
>
> I also contacted Bruce Tonkin to see if he would be available to
> moderate/facilitate a consolidated session and he is available if that is
> something folks want to consider.
>
>
>
> I also spoke to Tanzie and there is some flexibility in the schedule, for
> example, it might be possible to schedule a 2 hour session on Wednesday
> from 10.00 to 12.00, but my strong preference would be to have a 90 minute
> session as I think 2 hours is probably too much. Perhaps another option, if
> those that submitted the proposals don’t want to combine their sessions, is
> to allocate 30 minute slots (that would mean cutting one of the sessions).
> Of course that doesn’t really help overcome the problem of reducing the
> number of Topic Proposals to fit the number of slots available.
>
>
>
> In thinking about the meeting schedule from a holistic perspective, it’s
> my personal opinion that 7 sessions devoted to GDPR is too many. There’s no
> doubt that it is a ‘hot topic’, but we should be mindful that there are a
> number of other efforts and issues that also require some air time as well
> and with limited time available we should be respectful of the large number
> of community members that will be attending the meeting that may have no
> interest in the topic.
>
>
>
> I’m not sure what our next steps are for winnowing down the Topic
> Proposals. Perhaps Tanzie can remind us.
>
>
>
> Thanks everyone.
>
>
>
> Donna
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180810/c919d988/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list