[ALAC] ALAC Public Comments

[Evan Leibovitch]

On 25 October 2017 at 19:15, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>
wrote:


> ​[The Board intends] ​
> to as ask  SOs, ACs, and CCWGs to* "...include a similar analysis in
> recommendations, policies, and advice submitted to the Board for
> consideration."*
>

​
Perhaps the Board would consider reimbursing people for the time spent
fulfilling its new demands.
That is, all those except those who are already on someone else's payroll
or contract and will happily increase their billing.
Or maybe it would hire more staff to provide the extra hours needed to
fulfill..... unlikely.

Does nobody understand that these extra demands involve a COST to the
community?
That is, unless your time has no value.

When the Board wishes to direct ICANN's own resources, need is always
meticulously measured against resource availability and cost.
When creating new impositions on the volunteer community, no such
considerations appear to be in play.

Shameful.

Meanwhile, Alan's stated initiative to triage requests for public comment
and streamline the related decision-making is welcome and to be encouraged.

​- Evan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20171025/e2b091e0/attachment.html>