[ALAC] Consensus Call: ALAC Liaisons for 2017-18

[Holly Raiche]

I agree with the recommendations as outlined below

Holly
On 16 Aug 2017, at 12:51 pm, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> Following consultation with ALAC Members and with our current Liaisons, this is Consensus Call on how to address our Liaisons to the GNSO, ccNSO, SSAC and GAC for the year beginning at the end of ICANN60 to be held in Abu Dhabi.
> 
> Our current Liaisons are:
> 
> GNSO: Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> GAC: Yrjö Länsipuro
> ccNSO: Maureen Hilyard
> SSAC: Julie Hammer
> 
> All four are serving the ALAC well. Cheryl and Yrjö, both having served just one term (plus several months for Yrjö) and have agreed, with the support of the ALAC, to continue in their roles. Maureen and Julie have both indicated that they wish to step down from their Liaison roles. In the case of the ccNSO, we expect the identification and training of a replacement to take a significant number of months, during which time Maureen will stay on as Liaison. In the case of the SSAC, as Julie will become the new Vice-Chair of the SSAC in January, she would like to step down as soon as practical, but has agreed to serve for the first months of the ICANN year if a replacement has not been named by then.
> 
> In all four cases and in accordance with ALAC RoP 18.2 (See http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-RoP-2016-09 and reproduced at the end of this message), I am proposing that the ALAC re-appoint the current Liaisons.
> 
> In parallel with this we will also begin the process of identifying a replacement for both Maureen and Julie.
> 
> ccNSO:
> 
> A set of qualifications will be assembled and a call will be issued for volunteers interested in serving as the ALAC Liaison to the ccNSO. Depending on the number of candidates, either Maureen will work with the candidates (with the permission of the ccNSO) and ultimately makes a recommendation or set of recommendations on the future ccNSO Liaison. If there are too many candidates, the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee (AASC) working with Maureen will select a sub-set for Maureen to mentor. This process will continue into the coming year, but the success we had with a similar process last time there was a change in ccNSO Liaison indicates that it is worth the time and effort.
> 
> SSAC:
> 
> A set of qualifications will be assembled and a call will be issued for volunteers. The list of candidates will go to the AASC who, with Julie's assistance, will select no more than two potential candidates. Those selected will be forwarded to the SSAC (ratified by the ALAC). If the SSAC decides to admit one person to the SSAC, that person is our SSAC Liaison. If the SSAC selects more than one, this subset of people returns the AASC for final selection. Due to the number of steps and the requirement for the SSAC Membership Committee and the SSAC to meet, this may or may not happen prior to the end of ICANN60. 
> 
> With this message, I am initiating a Consensus Call of the ALAC to ratify the above recommendations. 
> 
> This Consensus Call will end at 23:59 UTC on Monday, 21 August 2017.
> 
> If there are any questions of comments, please direct them to either this list or to me directly. 
> 
> Although messages indicating support are welcome, they are not necessary. This Consensus Call will be deemed to have succeeded in the absence of significant opposition (greater than 20% as specified by ALAC RoP 12.3.3.1).
> 
> Alan
> 
> =======================
> 
> ALAC Rules of Procedure
> 
> 18.1 Appointments of At-Large Appointees to various bodies both inside and outside of ICANN will be made by the ALAC. Such appointments will normally be initiated by a call for volunteers, posted by the Chair/Staff to the Approved Distribution Lists, and on other lists if appropriate, allowing at least seven days for people to volunteer. The decision regarding appointments is typically made via Consensus. However, the Chair will initiate a secret ballot to determine which candidate is to be appointed if Consensus cannot be reached or if this is requested by any ALAC Member.
> 
> 18.2 By the decision of the ALAC, a current Appointee who is willing to continue in that role may be reconfirmed instead of initiating a new selection process.
> 
> 18.3 In the case of selections requiring complex criteria evaluation, the ALAC may choose to form a sub-committee to carry out the analysis and to make recommendations to the ALAC based on that analysis.
> 
> 18.4 For situations where the ALAC is not empowered to make appointments but rather to endorse one or more candidates, essentially the same process as described here for appointments should be used, but with the outcome being an endorsement.
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> 
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20170816/549b9ea8/attachment.html>