[ALAC] ATLAS II Recommendation 41

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

Dear Seun,

thanks for following up. You are indeed correct. These are two separate
questions, each with its own Y/N, thus not mutually exclusive.
Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 10/10/2016 16:23, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>
> As I understand what Olivier was asking, A is asking whether we should
> discuss the initiative with GSE. B is asking whether we should setup a
> team that will coordinate the initiative (and I assume the intention
> to create such team will also be on the agenda when discussing with GSE)
>
> So they seem to be two different tasks; A is a definite Yes, B is on
> whether we want to have some formality to this with a team incharged
> of it, like we have with CROPP.
>
> Overall I guess Olivier is sure in the best position to further clarify.
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
>
> On 10 Oct 2016 15:13, "Beran Dondeh" <berandondeh at yahoo.com
> <mailto:berandondeh at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>     My understanding was it's either the ALAC that takes up the job of
>     discussing with the GSE or the newly convened task force. Thus my
>     choice for option B. 
>
>     Unless I misunderstood??
>
>     Regards
>
>     Beran 
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>     On 10 Oct 2016, at 12:27, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
>     <mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>     Hello,
>>
>>     I don't think those are two options. I think both are required
>>     to-do and I will say a Yes to both questions.
>>
>>     The team to be setup can always occasionally engage GSE on how to
>>     better raise funds and utilise it for AtLarge
>>
>>     Regards
>>
>>     Sent from my LG G4
>>     Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>
>>
>>     On 10 Oct 2016 12:08, "Beran Dondeh via ALAC"
>>     <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>     <mailto:alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         Olivier
>>
>>         I would go for option B as this creates a one stop shop for
>>         sponsorship for all RALOS and in my opinion makes it easier
>>         going forward to organise At Large events. 
>>
>>         It also avoids duplication of efforts and basically having to
>>         re-invent the wheel each time a RALO has a GA or any other At
>>         Large event that requires sponsorship. 
>>
>>         My two cents 
>>
>>         Beran 
>>
>>         Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>         On 7 Oct 2016, at 15:24, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
>>         <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:
>>
>>>         Dear ALAC members,
>>>
>>>         The ATLAS II Implementation Task Force is actively following
>>>         up on the ATLAS II Recommendations contained in the At-Large
>>>         Declaration drafted during the second At-Large Summit that
>>>         took place in London in June 2014.
>>>
>>>         I would like to draw your attention to Recommendation 41:
>>>         Ref. https://community.icann.org/x/dpZCAw
>>>         <https://community.icann.org/x/dpZCAw>
>>>         The ALAC should work with the ICANN Board in seeking
>>>         additional sources of funding for At-Large activities.
>>>
>>>         The ATLAS II IT fleshed this recommendation out to mean that
>>>         the ALAC would work with the Global Stakeholder Engagement
>>>         Team on sponsorship issues.
>>>
>>>         The ALAC will be meeting with the Global Stakeholder
>>>         Engagement (GSE) Team in Hyderabad.
>>>
>>>         A. Should the ALAC discuss with the GSE about raising
>>>         external funds and getting sponsors? Y/N
>>>         B. Should an At-Large taskforce be established to tackle
>>>         sponsorship issues, including the development of the sponsor
>>>         database? This taskforce would bring all RALO leaderships
>>>         together to give them tools to help them with raising
>>>         sponsorship for F2F GAs, showcases, etc. Y/N
>>>
>>>         Looking forward to your kind responses.
>>>
>>>         Warmest regards,
>>>
>>>         Olivier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         ALAC mailing list
>>>         ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>         <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>>         https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>         <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>>
>>>         At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>>         ALAC Working Wiki:
>>>         https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>>         <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         ALAC mailing list
>>         ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>         <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>         https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>         <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>
>>         At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>         ALAC Working Wiki:
>>         https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>         <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20161010/17bc8332/attachment.html>