[ALAC] ATLAS II Recommendation 41

[Seun Ojedeji]

As I understand what Olivier was asking, A is asking whether we should
discuss the initiative with GSE. B is asking whether we should setup a team
that will coordinate the initiative (and I assume the intention to create
such team will also be on the agenda when discussing with GSE)

So they seem to be two different tasks; A is a definite Yes, B is on
whether we want to have some formality to this with a team incharged of it,
like we have with CROPP.

Overall I guess Olivier is sure in the best position to further clarify.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 10 Oct 2016 15:13, "Beran Dondeh" <berandondeh at yahoo.com> wrote:

> My understanding was it's either the ALAC that takes up the job of
> discussing with the GSE or the newly convened task force. Thus my choice
> for option B.
>
> Unless I misunderstood??
>
> Regards
>
> Beran
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 10 Oct 2016, at 12:27, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't think those are two options. I think both are required to-do and I
> will say a Yes to both questions.
>
> The team to be setup can always occasionally engage GSE on how to better
> raise funds and utilise it for AtLarge
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On 10 Oct 2016 12:08, "Beran Dondeh via ALAC" <
> alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
>
>> Olivier
>>
>> I would go for option B as this creates a one stop shop for sponsorship
>> for all RALOS and in my opinion makes it easier going forward to organise
>> At Large events.
>>
>> It also avoids duplication of efforts and basically having to re-invent
>> the wheel each time a RALO has a GA or any other At Large event that
>> requires sponsorship.
>>
>> My two cents
>>
>> Beran
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 7 Oct 2016, at 15:24, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear ALAC members,
>>
>> The ATLAS II Implementation Task Force is actively following up on the
>> ATLAS II Recommendations contained in the At-Large Declaration drafted
>> during the second At-Large Summit that took place in London in June 2014.
>>
>> I would like to draw your attention to Recommendation 41:
>> Ref. https://community.icann.org/x/dpZCAw
>> The ALAC should work with the ICANN Board in seeking additional sources
>> of funding for At-Large activities.
>>
>> The ATLAS II IT fleshed this recommendation out to mean that the ALAC
>> would work with the Global Stakeholder Engagement Team on sponsorship
>> issues.
>>
>> The ALAC will be meeting with the Global Stakeholder Engagement (GSE)
>> Team in Hyderabad.
>>
>> A. Should the ALAC discuss with the GSE about raising external funds and
>> getting sponsors? Y/N
>> B. Should an At-Large taskforce be established to tackle sponsorship
>> issues, including the development of the sponsor database? This taskforce
>> would bring all RALO leaderships together to give them tools to help them
>> with raising sponsorship for F2F GAs, showcases, etc. Y/N
>>
>> Looking forward to your kind responses.
>>
>> Warmest regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di
>> splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di
>> splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20161010/60d81a60/attachment.html>