[ALAC] Fwd: [council] FW: [Correspondence from Steve Crocker] PICs and Category 1, Safeguard 1-8 TLDs

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Wed Mar 23 10:43:00 UTC 2016


Dear Alan,

thank you for your follow-up on this matter. It is good to see that,
after so much time going around playing cat and mouse and turning in
circles, things are actually moving. I can't say that I am 100% pleased
because I deplore the fact that so much time was taken to make us lose
our time whilst contracts were being signed in the meantime -- which
leaves a bitter after-taste. I am also worried in the back of my mind,
that this is another way to kick the cork ahead a few more months,
years, to keep us running after it.

But let's remain positive! So we're set on a two-pronged track:
- CCT-RT
- PDP on next gTLD rounds

In my opinion, we need to keep the same group of people to support BOTH
tracks, otherwise I am pretty sure that the issue will be quietly
dropped between the two tracks... as things sometimes are. How are we
going to strategize this? Which working group in ALAC will follow this
closely and support our representatives in both the Review Team and the
PDP Working Group?
- New gTLD Working Group?
- Registration Issues Working Group?
- Newly established Public Interest Working Group?

Looking forward to your kind reply.

Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 23/03/2016 05:04, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> Thanks Olivier, you beat me to it.
>
> You will all recall that at the ALAC-Board meeting in Marrakech,
> Cherine Chalably had suggested that perhaps instead of forming a new
> group to inspect the Category 1, SG 1-8 TLDs, that the task could be
> referred to either or both of the CCT Review Team and the GNSO new
> gTLD PDP, and he suggested that a phone call be set up the following
> week to discuss this. That was done and I met with Cherine, Thomas
> Schneider and James Bladel last week. A summary of that meeting will
> be distributed shortly, but the letter that Olivier attached was the
> result.
>
> Although the Board cannot instruct either the RT or the PDP to do
> anything, the letter does set some expectations. Moreover, I was very
> please when, on this week's meeting of the GTLD PDP, Jeff, Neuman, one
> of the co-chairs, presented a brief summary of the issues to be
> discussed in the PDP< and the issue of such "special" TLDs was covered
> very well.
>
> Alan
>
> At 22/03/2016 03:49 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>> FYI
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [council] FW: [Correspondence from Steve Crocker] PICs and
>> Category 1, Safeguard 1-8 TLDs
>> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:51:11 +0000
>> From: James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com> <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>
>> To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
>> <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>>
>>
>> Council Colleagues -
>>
>> For your review, please see the attached letter from Steve Crocker to
>> the chairs of the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice
>> Review Team (CCT-RT), and the PDP WG on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>> From: Wendy Profit <wendy.profit at icann.org
>> <mailto:wendy.profit at icann.org> >
>> Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 13:47
>> To: "zuck at ACTonline.org <mailto:zuck at ACTonline.org>"
>> <zuck at ACTonline.org <mailto:zuck at ACTonline.org>>, "avri at acm.org
>> <mailto:avri at acm.org>" <avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>,
>> "scoates at twitter.com <mailto:scoates at twitter.com>"
>> <scoates at twitter.com <mailto:scoates at twitter.com>>,
>> "jeff.neuman at comlaude.com <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>"
>> <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com> >
>> Cc: "Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch
>> <mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>"
>> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch
>> <mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>>, Cherine Chalaby
>> <cherine.chalaby at icann.org <mailto:cherine.chalaby at icann.org>>,
>> "alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>"
>> <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> >, James
>> Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>, Jamie
>> Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org> >,
>> Steve Crocker <steve.crocker at icann.org
>> <mailto:steve.crocker at icann.org> >, David Olive
>> <david.olive at icann.org <mailto:david.olive at icann.org>>,
>> "Board-Ops-Team at icann.org <mailto:Board-Ops-Team at icann.org>"
>> <Board-Ops-Team at icann.org <mailto:Board-Ops-Team at icann.org> >,
>> "gacsec at icann.org <mailto:gacsec at icann.org>" <gacsec at icann.org
>> <mailto:gacsec at icann.org>>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich at icann.org
>> <mailto:Heidi.Ullrich at icann.org> >
>> Subject: [Correspondence from Steve Crocker] PICs and Category 1,
>> Safeguard 1-8 TLDs
>>
>> Dear Jonathan, Avri, Stephen, and Jeff,
>>
>> Please find the attached letter from Steve Crocker on behalf of the
>> ICANN Board regarding concerns raised by the ALAC and GAC around the
>> effectiveness of the contracted PICs for the GAC Category 1,
>> Safeguard 1-8 TLDs (“Safeguard PICs”).
>>
>> With warm regards,
>>
>> Wendy Profit
>> ICANN Board Operations Specialist
>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>> Los Angeles, CA 90094
>> Mobile: 1-310-773-6811
>> Office: 1-310-578-8695
>>  
>> []
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>> <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC>
>> )

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160323/0731ab87/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list