[ALAC] The Ten Worst Top Level Domains
gbruen at knujon.com
gbruen at knujon.com
Tue Mar 8 19:15:16 UTC 2016
Please do
On 3/8/16 7:13 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
> Garth:
> This report is certainly a useful addition to the sources of
> information. Congrats.
>
> The Consumer Trsut and Safeguards subteam of the CCT RT would
> certainly be interested in this report. With your permission, maybe I
> could share the link with the CCT Review Team?
>
> Best,
> -Carlton
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> /Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround/
> =============================
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:48 AM, gbruen at knujon.com
> <mailto:gbruen at knujon.com> <gbruen at knujon.com
> <mailto:gbruen at knujon.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Olivier. This may or may not be a coincidence, but I
> definitely did not plan on releasing my own data at the same time
> as Spamhaus.
>
> However, I have conducted my own review of spam-heavy TLDs and
> will be publishing the results today. I contacted each registry
> directly and waited a few days to hear back from each of them. I
> can say that some of the registries have been responsive and other
> have not. Time will reveal how each registry handles the abuse
> issue, and this is what I plan to look at.
>
> My report looks at all TLDs, not just new TLDs, but there is a
> clear pattern which supports the Spamhaus results, in that new
> gTLDs are rapidly passing legacy TLDs in abuse rates.
>
> The report also editorializes ICANN's consumer trust issues in
> terms of the website and compliance.
>
> ALAC get's the first crack:
> http://www.knujon.com/knujon-icann-consumers-rygy-limbo-032016.pdf
>
>
>
>
> On 3/7/16 6:27 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> as you know, the ALAC has been wondering about whether new
> gTLDs brought
> consumer trust.
> Well - an organisation has released a list of gTLDs that don't
> appear to
> be as trustworthy as others when it comes to spam.
> https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/728/spamhaus-presents-the-worlds-worst-top-level-domains
>
> Since this relates to spam, and we are concerned about universal
> acceptance of new gTLDs, how likely is it that some of the
> TLDs listed
> might be blacklisted in mailers in the future?
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Garth Bruen
> gbruen at knujon.com <mailto:gbruen at knujon.com>
>
> 617-947-3805 <tel:617-947-3805>
> http://www.knujon.com
> Fisher College, Criminal Justice Division
> ICANN At-Large Advisory Council
> Author: WHOIS Running the Internet
> http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118679555.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>
>
--
Garth Bruen
gbruen at knujon.com
617-947-3805
http://www.knujon.com
Fisher College, Criminal Justice Division
ICANN At-Large Advisory Council
Author: WHOIS Running the Internet
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118679555.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160308/d19a6b5f/attachment.html>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list