[ALAC] The Ten Worst Top Level Domains

Carlton Samuels carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 19:13:32 UTC 2016


Garth:
This report is certainly a useful addition to the sources of information.
Congrats.

The Consumer Trsut and Safeguards subteam of the CCT RT would certainly be
interested in this report. With your permission, maybe I could share the
link with the CCT Review Team?

Best,
-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:48 AM, gbruen at knujon.com <gbruen at knujon.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Olivier. This may or may not be a coincidence, but I definitely did
> not plan on releasing my own data at the same time as Spamhaus.
>
> However, I have conducted my own review of spam-heavy TLDs and will be
> publishing the results today. I contacted each registry directly and waited
> a few days to hear back from each of them. I can say that some of the
> registries have been responsive and other have not. Time will reveal how
> each registry handles the abuse issue, and this is what I plan to look at.
>
> My report looks at all TLDs, not just new TLDs, but there is a clear
> pattern which supports the Spamhaus results, in that new gTLDs are rapidly
> passing legacy TLDs in abuse rates.
>
> The report also editorializes ICANN's consumer trust issues in terms of
> the website and compliance.
>
> ALAC get's the first crack:
> http://www.knujon.com/knujon-icann-consumers-rygy-limbo-032016.pdf
>
>
>
>
> On 3/7/16 6:27 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> as you know, the ALAC has been wondering about whether new gTLDs brought
>> consumer trust.
>> Well - an organisation has released a list of gTLDs that don't appear to
>> be as trustworthy as others when it comes to spam.
>>
>> https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/728/spamhaus-presents-the-worlds-worst-top-level-domains
>>
>> Since this relates to spam, and we are concerned about universal
>> acceptance of new gTLDs, how likely is it that some of the TLDs listed
>> might be blacklisted in mailers in the future?
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Garth Bruen
> gbruen at knujon.com
>
> 617-947-3805
> http://www.knujon.com
> Fisher College, Criminal Justice Division
> ICANN At-Large Advisory Council
> Author: WHOIS Running the Internet
> http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118679555.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160308/a7d18621/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list